Journal article Open Access
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"> <identifier identifierType="URL">https://zenodo.org/record/3757131</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Lit, L.W. Cornelis van</creatorName> <givenName>L.W. Cornelis van</givenName> <familyName>Lit</familyName> <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0003-1846-4703</nameIdentifier> <affiliation>Utrecht University</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title>An Ottoman Commentary Tradition on Ghazālī's Tahāfut al-falāsifa. Preliminary Observations</title> </titles> <publisher>Zenodo</publisher> <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear> <dates> <date dateType="Issued">2020-04-19</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType> <alternateIdentifiers> <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/3757131</alternateIdentifier> </alternateIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.1163/18778372-04303004</relatedIdentifier> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/islam</relatedIdentifier> </relatedIdentifiers> <rightsList> <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights> <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights> </rightsList> <descriptions> <description descriptionType="Abstract"><p>Ghazālī&rsquo;s &ldquo;The incoherence of the philosophers&rdquo; spurred a counter-commentary by Ibn Rushd, as is well known. Up to ten texts from Ottoman scholars also purport to be commentaries on the&nbsp;Tahāfut, constituting a commentary tradition that has been neglected by scholars. The first two commentators, Khojazāda (d. 1488) and ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn Ṭūsī (d. 1482), are not line-by-line exegetes of Ghazālī, but rather update the discussions that Ghazālī broached to the level of knowledge available to them. Khojazāda was favored by the Ottomans, but ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn&rsquo;s content, methodology and argumentation style proves to be just as, if not more, interesting for us.</p></description> </descriptions> </resource>
Views | 29 |
Downloads | 27 |
Data volume | 9.4 MB |
Unique views | 26 |
Unique downloads | 24 |