Dataset Open Access

ALOHA Wirewalker dataset

Barone, Benedetto; Karl, David M.


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3750468</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Barone, Benedetto</creatorName>
      <givenName>Benedetto</givenName>
      <familyName>Barone</familyName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-1102-7837</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Karl, David M.</creatorName>
      <givenName>David M.</givenName>
      <familyName>Karl</familyName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-6660-6721</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>ALOHA Wirewalker dataset</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Wirewalker</subject>
    <subject>Autonomous</subject>
    <subject>Profiler</subject>
    <subject>Observation</subject>
    <subject>Lagrangian</subject>
    <subject>Oceanography</subject>
    <subject>Bio-optics</subject>
    <subject>Optics</subject>
    <subject>University of Hawaii</subject>
    <subject>in-situ</subject>
    <subject>Karl</subject>
    <subject>Barone</subject>
    <subject>HOT</subject>
    <subject>SCOPE</subject>
    <subject>hydrography</subject>
    <subject>oxygen</subject>
    <subject>backscatter</subject>
    <subject>fluorescence</subject>
    <subject>chlorophyll</subject>
    <subject>cdom</subject>
    <subject>temperature</subject>
    <subject>salinity</subject>
    <subject>depth</subject>
    <subject>ctd</subject>
    <subject>optode</subject>
    <subject>irradiance</subject>
    <subject>profile</subject>
    <subject>North Pacific</subject>
    <subject>Gyre</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2020-04-14</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/3750468</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3750467</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;The ALOHA Wirewalker dataset is a collection of autonomous oceanographic observations from the North Pacific Ocean that were obtained with two wave-powered drifting profilers (Wirewalker&amp;trade;, Del Mar Oceanographic) since June 2017. The autonomous profilers were deployed in the open ocean where they moved vertically along a wire that was suspended between a float at the sea surface and a weight placed at 400 m depth. The system horizontal displacement followed the ocean currents. These observations allow the investigation of the diel ecosystem variability and the study of the formation and maintenance of relatively thin layers of plankton accumulation thanks to the high resolution both vertically (~0.1 m) and temporally (1/6 s).&lt;br&gt;
The Wirewalkers were deployed during expeditions of the Hawaii Ocean Time-series (HOT) where they complemented shipboard measurements of the physical and biogeochemical characteristics of the ocean. Additionally, the Wirewalkers were deployed during three expeditions organized by the Simons Collaboration on Ocean Processes and Ecology (SCOPE).&lt;br&gt;
Measurements collected within the ALOHA Wirewalker project have been processed using a consistent procedure in order to facilitate the joint analysis of the observations from different deployments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The autonomous profilers collected vertically-resolved observations every ~30 minutes from the sea surface to a maximum depth of 400 m. Measurements include hydrographical, biogeochemical, and optical parameters. Hydrographical measurements were collected with a RBR Maestro and include temperature, salinity, and depth. The concentration of dissolved oxygen was measured using a fast response optode (Rinko III, JFE). An ECO Puck sensor (Sea-Bird) measured proxies for particle concentration (scattering at 124&amp;deg; and 650 nm), pigment concentration (chlorophyll fluorescence), and the concentration of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) through fluorescence. A c-star transmissometer (Sea-Bird) measured beam attenuation at 650 nm, which is a second proxy for particle concentration. Downwelling irradiance in four spectral bands (PAR, 380, 412, and 490 nm) was measured with an OCR-504 (Sea-Bird). The coordinates of the Wirewalker were recorded using a Pacific Gyre and a Xeos tracking devices with Iridium satellite communication.&lt;br&gt;
Changes in sensor performance were monitored and tracked by recording the signal in controlled conditions before deployment: dark counts were recorded for the ECO Puck and the OCR-504; dark and air counts were recorded for the c-star; a two-point calibration was done for the Rinko III.&lt;br&gt;
Beam attenuation measurements are not shared in this first release of the Wirewalker dataset for two main reasons: 1) problems with water condensation on the instrument optics impacted several of our deployments; 2) there is no protocol to normalize beam attenuation profiles to account for sensor cleanliness (the subtraction of the minimum value from each profile is a common approach, but it does not insure that different deployments are comparable).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the period between June 2017 and February 2020, the ALOHA Wirewalkers were deployed 21 times, for a cumulative duration of 79 days during which they collected a total of 3797 vertical profiles from 0 to 400 m. All deployments were in the North Pacific Ocean, north of the Hawaiian archipelago. Most deployments took place during HOT cruises and lasted between 1.2 and 2.4 days. Five deployments took place during SCOPE cruises (MESO-SCOPE, Eddy Experiment, Gradients 3) and lasted up to 13.1 days.&lt;br&gt;
The two Wirewalkers were used for a similar number of deployments. The Wirewalker mounting the data logger RBR Maestro 80330 was deployed during 10 cruises, while the Wirewalker mounting RBR Maestro 80331 was deployed during 11 cruises.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;DATA FORMAT&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Each deployment of the ALOHA Wirewalker dataset is distributed in two files: 1) a comma separated value (.csv) data file in which each column is a different kind of measurement; and 2) a spreadsheet (.xlsx) containing the metadata including measurement units and other information about the deployment and the columns of the data file.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, the observations collected when the Wirewalker was deployed during the HOT-306 cruise are contained in these two files: HOT306_data_L1_v1_0.csv and HOT306_metadata_L1_v1_0.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The time reported in the two files is in GMT, depth is reported in meters, and the coordinates are in &amp;deg;N and &amp;deg;E.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;DATA PROCESSING&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The first processing of Wirewalker measurements was done by the RBR routines of the data logging system (RBR Maestro). The RBR processing followed the scaling procedures indicated by the manufacturers of the different instruments with few exceptions: factory calibrations were not applied for the ECO Puck sensors; the Rinko III processing used the logger temperature rather than the instrument temperature to calculate oxygen saturation and no pressure correction was applied; beam attenuation was measured with respect to air instead of water.&lt;br&gt;
Besides the RBR processing, data were further processed using MATLAB. As a first step, we merged the coordinates collected with the positioning sensor to the underwater observations collected by the Wirewalkers. We then selected only observations collected during the ascent phase of the profile, which were less noisy due to the relatively constant vertical velocity of the profiler.&lt;br&gt;
The hydrographical processing involved calculating several hydrographical parameters including absolute salinity, practical salinity, conservative temperature, depth, and potential density anomaly with respect to a water pressure of 0 decibar. For these calculations, we used the routines from the Gibbs-SeaWater Oceanographic Toolbox (http://www.teos-10.org/software.htm).&lt;br&gt;
Processing of the bio-optical measurements started with applying the linear scaling coefficients of the ECO Puck sensors based on the factory calibration. Furthermore, measurements of scattering at 124&amp;deg; were scaled to obtain the particle backscattering coefficient, bbp, by subtracting the scattering due to seawater, and by scaling to scattering at all backward directions. Seawater scattering was calculated using the routines provided by Zhang et al. (2009), and the geometrical scaling was done by using the conversion coefficient &amp;chi; = 1.076 proposed by Sullivan et al. (2013).&lt;br&gt;
The most extensive processing was done on measurements of oxygen saturation from the Rinko III sensor. This process included four steps: modification of linear calibration coefficients, time-response correction, pressure correction, and alignment with Winkler oxygen measurements.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
The modification of the linear calibration coefficients was based on repeated tracking of instrument performance with two-point calibrations. From each two-point calibration we calculated new slope and intercept for the regression to calculate oxygen saturation. These parameters were tracked over time and we noticed a sharp change in the intercept value approximately in March 2018 for both sensors. For sake of simplicity, we assumed a stepwise change in sensor performance with different slopes and intercepts for the period before March 2018 and for the period starting in March 2018. We then corrected for the instrument response time by using the inverse filtering algorithm proposed by Bittig et al. (2014). We assigned the instrument response time iteratively by aligning the observations collected during ascent and descent, as previously done by Barone et al. (2019) for underwater glider measurements. To keep the process simple, we assumed that the response time of the instrument did not change over time, and we assigned it a value of 12 seconds (even though there are indications that the response time increased from our initial deployments). Furthermore, since inverse filtering amplified the noise, we applied a 2 seconds running mean to smooth the output signal. After this step, we corrected oxygen saturation to account for the effect of pressure, based on the formula provided by the manufacturer. We then calculated the solubility of oxygen in seawater and obtained dissolved oxygen concentration from measurements of oxygen saturation. This signal was then compared with dissolved oxygen measurements using the Winkler technique from nearby ship operations during each deployment. For this comparison, we only considered shipboard measurements in the upper 50 m of the water column, which were collected less than 0.3 days apart, and a distance lower than 10 km from the Wirewalker. We considered Winkler measurements to be more accurate than the optode measurements so we corrected the latter by subtracting the average offset with the Winkler for each deployment. We then recalculated oxygen saturation from the offset-corrected oxygen concentration.&lt;br&gt;
Some measurements were discarded because of problems with the sensors. Specifically, oxygen is not reported for the two MESO-SCOPE deployments because they were characterized by a non-linear drift in sensor performance. These were the first deployments of the Rinko III, which might be subject to faster drift when the sensing foil is new.&lt;br&gt;
Backscattering was anomalously high during HOT-302 and HOT-303. We discarded those measurements because the deep water value appeared largely inconsistent with all other observations, and the sensor started recording more typical values towards the end of the HOT-303 deployment.&lt;br&gt;
The OCR-504 sensor was not mounted on Wirewalkers during both MESO-SCOPE deployments and during HOT cruises 296, 297, and 298. For those deployments, irradiance was not measured at 380, 412, and 490 nm, while PAR irradiance was measured with a Biospherical QCP cosine sensor. Furthermore, the OCR-504 did not record any observations during HOT-314.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;COMPARISON WITH SHIPBOARD MEASUREMENTS&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To verify the accuracy of the Wirewalker measurements, we compared the HOT deployments with the observations collected with the shipboard CTD system, which were calibrated using laboratory analyses on water collected with Niskin bottles. Considering that shipboard measurements and Wirewalker measurements were collected at a distance of several km, we did not expect that each deployment showed complete consistency between the two set of observations. However, we did not expect systematic discrepancies for all deployments. For this comparison, we considered only shipboard observations collected during the time when the Wirewalker was deployed. The comparison shows good consistency between shipboard and Wirewalker measurements of temperature and salinity, but not of oxygen concentration. Specifically, we observed oxygen differences that increased with depth and changed with time, with larger differences measured in the most recent deployments. This observation seems to indicate a drift in the performance of the Rinko III sensor.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We thank Lance Fujieki for providing the Winkler oxygen measurements collected during HOT and SCOPE cruises. This research was supported by the Simons Foundation (SCOPE award 329108 to D.M.K. and E.F. DeLong).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;REFERENCES&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Barone, B., Nicholson, D., Ferr&amp;oacute;n, S., Firing, E. and Karl, D., 2019. The estimation of gross oxygen production and community respiration from autonomous time‐series measurements in the oligotrophic ocean. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 17(12), pp.650-664.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bittig, H.C., Fiedler, B., Scholz, R., Krahmann, G. and K&amp;ouml;rtzinger, A., 2014. Time response of oxygen optodes on profiling platforms and its dependence on flow speed and temperature. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 12(8), pp.617-636.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sullivan, J.M., Twardowski, M.S., Ronald, J., Zaneveld, V. and Moore, C.C., 2013. Measuring optical backscattering in water. In Light scattering reviews 7 (pp. 189-224). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Zhang, X., Hu, L. and He, M.X., 2009. Scattering by pure seawater: effect of salinity. Optics Express, 17(7), pp.5698-5710.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>
35
6
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 3535
Downloads 66
Data volume 608.5 MB608.5 MB
Unique views 2828
Unique downloads 22

Share

Cite as