Working paper Open Access

Exact derivation of Kirchhoff's integral theorem and diffraction formula using high-school math

Putland, Gavin Richard


JSON-LD (schema.org) Export

{
  "inLanguage": {
    "alternateName": "eng", 
    "@type": "Language", 
    "name": "English"
  }, 
  "description": "<p>A theory of diffraction is developed from three premises: causality (including the assumption that the wave function had a beginning), superposition, and the form of the wave function due to a monopole source. It is shown that the wave function in a region <em>R</em>, due to sources outside <em>R</em> (that is, in <em>R&#39;</em>), is identical to that due to a distribution of spatiotemporal dipole (STD) sources on the surface <em>S</em> separating <em>R&#39;</em> and <em>R</em>, facing <em>R</em>, with a strength density given by the original wave function on <em>S</em> (divided by 4<em>&pi;</em>, under the adopted definition of strength). The Kirchhoff integral theorem and consequent diffraction formulae are obtained by superposing the elemental wave functions due to the sources on <em>S</em>. Whereas D.A.B. Miller (1991) justified the STDs by comparison with Kirchhoff&#39;s integral, I derive the integral (with a near-primary-source correction to Miller&#39;s form) solely from the STDs. Diffraction by an aperture in an opaque screen is modeled by assuming that we retain only the sources on that part of <em>S</em> which spans the aperture. This assumption avoids the notorious inconsistency in Kirchhoff&#39;s boundary conditions (1882), but gives the same diffraction integral. It also yields the consistent saltus conditions of Kottler (1923) and a more direct saltus description of the aperture, giving the same solution in <em>R</em>. Finally, the diffraction integral for a monopole primary source is transformed to a geometrical-optics term plus an integral along the edge of the aperture, and applied to the Poisson-Arago spot. The transformation (due to Maggi and Rubinowicz) is first derived from a far-field/short-wavelength assumption, but later re-derived exactly for general time-dependence, and shown to be a valid approximation for a weakly directional primary source.</p>", 
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4757-6341", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Putland, Gavin Richard"
    }
  ], 
  "headline": "Exact derivation of Kirchhoff's integral theorem and diffraction formula using high-school math", 
  "image": "https://zenodo.org/static/img/logos/zenodo-gradient-round.svg", 
  "datePublished": "2020-04-09", 
  "keywords": [
    "wave optics, diffraction, obliquity factor, inclination factor, spatiotemporal dipoles, Huygens' principle, Huygens-Fresnel, Huygens-Kirchhoff, Fresnel-Kirchhoff, Helmholtz-Kirchhoff, saltus problem, Maggi-Rubinowicz, Poisson's spot, Arago's spot"
  ], 
  "version": "4", 
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/3745897", 
  "contributor": [], 
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3745897", 
  "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3745897", 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "name": "Exact derivation of Kirchhoff's integral theorem and diffraction formula using high-school math"
}
1,486
1,555
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 1,486873
Downloads 1,555499
Data volume 694.5 MB264.4 MB
Unique views 1,334816
Unique downloads 1,415454

Share

Cite as