Working paper Open Access

Exact derivation of Kirchhoff's integral theorem and diffraction formula using high-school math

Putland, Gavin Richard

Citation Style Language JSON Export

{
"publisher": "Zenodo",
"DOI": "10.5281/zenodo.3745897",
"language": "eng",
"title": "Exact derivation of Kirchhoff's integral theorem and diffraction formula using high-school math",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2020,
4,
9
]
]
},
"abstract": "<p>A theory of diffraction is developed from three premises: causality (including the assumption that the wave function had a beginning), superposition, and the form of the wave function due to a monopole source. It is shown that the wave function in a region <em>R</em>, due to sources outside <em>R</em> (that is, in <em>R&#39;</em>), is identical to that due to a distribution of spatiotemporal dipole (STD) sources on the surface <em>S</em> separating <em>R&#39;</em> and <em>R</em>, facing <em>R</em>, with a strength density given by the original wave function on <em>S</em> (divided by 4<em>&pi;</em>, under the adopted definition of strength). The Kirchhoff integral theorem and consequent diffraction formulae are obtained by superposing the elemental wave functions due to the sources on <em>S</em>. Whereas D.A.B. Miller (1991) justified the STDs by comparison with Kirchhoff&#39;s integral, I derive the integral (with a near-primary-source correction to Miller&#39;s form) solely from the STDs. Diffraction by an aperture in an opaque screen is modeled by assuming that we retain only the sources on that part of <em>S</em> which spans the aperture. This assumption avoids the notorious inconsistency in Kirchhoff&#39;s boundary conditions (1882), but gives the same diffraction integral. It also yields the consistent saltus conditions of Kottler (1923) and a more direct saltus description of the aperture, giving the same solution in <em>R</em>. Finally, the diffraction integral for a monopole primary source is transformed to a geometrical-optics term plus an integral along the edge of the aperture, and applied to the Poisson-Arago spot. The transformation (due to Maggi and Rubinowicz) is first derived from a far-field/short-wavelength assumption, but later re-derived exactly for general time-dependence, and shown to be a valid approximation for a weakly directional primary source.</p>",
"author": [
{
"family": "Putland, Gavin Richard"
}
],
"version": "4",
"type": "article",
"id": "3745897"
}
1,482
1,523
views