January 31, 2020 Project deliverable Open Access

Aasheim, Jens H.; Schirrwagen, Jochen; Kuchma, Iryna; Franck, Gwen; Hermans, Emilie; Rettberg, Najla; Steiner, Tobias

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3701428</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Aasheim, Jens H.</creatorName>
      <givenName>Jens H.</givenName>
      <familyName>Aasheim</familyName>
      <affiliation>UNIT</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Schirrwagen, Jochen</creatorName>
      <givenName>Jochen</givenName>
      <familyName>Schirrwagen</familyName>
      <affiliation>UNIBI</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Kuchma, Iryna</creatorName>
      <givenName>Iryna</givenName>
      <familyName>Kuchma</familyName>
      <affiliation>EIFL</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Franck, Gwen</creatorName>
      <givenName>Gwen</givenName>
      <familyName>Franck</familyName>
      <affiliation>EIFL</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Hermans, Emilie</creatorName>
      <givenName>Emilie</givenName>
      <familyName>Hermans</familyName>
      <affiliation>UGENT</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Rettberg, Najla</creatorName>
      <givenName>Najla</givenName>
      <familyName>Rettberg</familyName>
      <affiliation>UGOE</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Steiner, Tobias</creatorName>
      <givenName>Tobias</givenName>
      <familyName>Steiner</familyName>
      <affiliation>UGOE</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>D6.2 – Best Practice Guide for Co-Operative Models of  Publishing</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2020-01-31</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Project deliverable</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/3701428</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3701427</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/openaire</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;This OpenAIRE1 report is based on input from the publishing and library community collected&lt;br&gt;
during and in connection with the OpenAIRE workshop on &amp;ldquo;Sustainable&amp;nbsp; non-APC&amp;nbsp; Open&amp;nbsp; Access&lt;br&gt;
Publishing Models&amp;rdquo;, held at Bielefeld University on February 26-27, 2019.2 It seeks to: &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
- Showcase and review selected non-APC and collaborative publication models in the context of&lt;br&gt;
the current Open Access publishing landscape. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
- Suggest a set of recommendations aimed at research funders, policymakers and the publishing&lt;br&gt;
community, for moving towards a more sustainable and diverse Open Access publishing future,&lt;br&gt;
one where collaborative and non-APC publishing could represent a viable, cost and resource&lt;br&gt;
effective alternative to APC-based business models for Open Access publishing.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
In the current landscape collaborative and non-APC Open Access publishing channels are facing&lt;br&gt;
several challenges: Predictable access to funding and resources to finance these models and&lt;br&gt;
medium to long term planning and stability. Moreover, visibility and reputation of these channels&lt;br&gt;
compete with APC-based and subscription channels for the research community&amp;rsquo;s perception of&lt;br&gt;
quality and prestige as well as for the awareness of research funders and institutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>