Presentation Open Access

Open Science vs. Intellectual Property in a Democratic Order

Caso, Roberto


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3686843</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Caso, Roberto</creatorName>
      <givenName>Roberto</givenName>
      <familyName>Caso</familyName>
      <affiliation>Università di Trento</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Open Science vs. Intellectual Property in a Democratic Order</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2020</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Open Science</subject>
    <subject>Open Access</subject>
    <subject>Closed Science</subject>
    <subject>Research assessment</subject>
    <subject>Science evaluation system</subject>
    <subject>Commodification</subject>
    <subject>Intellectual property</subject>
    <subject>Copyright law</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2020-02-25</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Presentation</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/3686843</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3686842</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;The evaluation of scientific research is based on data protected by secrecy and intellectual property (e.g., Elsevier Scopus or Clarivate Web of Science). While science has progressed thanks to public dialogue, the current evaluation system is centered on private control of information. This represents a fundamental shift from democratic to authoritarian science. Open Science may confront this change only if it is accepted as the heir, in the digital age, of the values and principles that public and democratic science has traditionally fostered in the age of printing, thus becoming the guardian of a democratic society.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>
68
46
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 6868
Downloads 4646
Data volume 286.0 MB286.0 MB
Unique views 6363
Unique downloads 4242

Share

Cite as