Journal article Open Access

Human linguisticality and the building blocks of languages

Haspelmath, Martin


DCAT Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:adms="http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dctype="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/" xmlns:dcat="http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#" xmlns:duv="http://www.w3.org/ns/duv#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:frapo="http://purl.org/cerif/frapo/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:gsp="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" xmlns:locn="http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#" xmlns:org="http://www.w3.org/ns/org#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:prov="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:vcard="http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#" xmlns:wdrs="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://zenodo.org/record/3678477">
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://zenodo.org/record/3678477</dct:identifier>
    <foaf:page rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/3678477"/>
    <dct:creator>
      <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2100-8493">
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent"/>
        <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">0000-0003-2100-8493</dct:identifier>
        <foaf:name>Haspelmath, Martin</foaf:name>
        <foaf:givenName>Martin</foaf:givenName>
        <foaf:familyName>Haspelmath</foaf:familyName>
        <org:memberOf>
          <foaf:Organization>
            <foaf:name>Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History</foaf:name>
          </foaf:Organization>
        </org:memberOf>
      </rdf:Description>
    </dct:creator>
    <dct:title>Human linguisticality and the building blocks of languages</dct:title>
    <dct:publisher>
      <foaf:Agent>
        <foaf:name>Zenodo</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Agent>
    </dct:publisher>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear">2020</dct:issued>
    <frapo:isFundedBy rdf:resource="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/670985/"/>
    <schema:funder>
      <foaf:Organization>
        <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">10.13039/501100000780</dct:identifier>
        <foaf:name>European Commission</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Organization>
    </schema:funder>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2020-01-31</dct:issued>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/3678477"/>
    <adms:identifier>
      <adms:Identifier>
        <skos:notation rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://zenodo.org/record/3678477</skos:notation>
        <adms:schemeAgency>url</adms:schemeAgency>
      </adms:Identifier>
    </adms:identifier>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03056"/>
    <dct:description>&lt;p&gt;This paper discusses the widely held idea that the building blocks of languages (features, categories, and architectures) are part of an innate blueprint for Human Language, and notes that if one allows for convergent cultural evolution of grammatical structures, then much of the motivation for it disappears. I start by observing that human linguisticality (=the biological capacity for language) is uncontroversial, and that confusing terminology (&amp;ldquo;language faculty,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;universal grammar&amp;rdquo;) has often clouded the substantive issues in the past. I argue that like musicality and other biological capacities, linguisticality is best studied in a broadly comparative perspective. Comparing languages like other aspects of culture means that the comparisons are of the Greenbergian type, but many linguists have presupposed that the comparisons should be done as in chemistry, with the presupposition that the innate building blocks are also the material that individual grammars are made of. In actual fact, the structural uniqueness of languages (in lexicon, phonology, and morphosyntax) leads us to prefer a Greenbergian approach to comparison, which is also more in line with the Minimalist idea that there are very few domain-specific elements of the biological capacity for language.&lt;/p&gt;</dct:description>
    <dct:accessRights rdf:resource="http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/access-right/PUBLIC"/>
    <dct:accessRights>
      <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">
        <rdfs:label>Open Access</rdfs:label>
      </dct:RightsStatement>
    </dct:accessRights>
    <dct:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"/>
    <dcat:distribution>
      <dcat:Distribution>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03056">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03056</dcat:accessURL>
        <dcat:byteSize>278757</dcat:byteSize>
        <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/3678477/files/Haspelmath2020.pdf">https://zenodo.org/record/3678477/files/Haspelmath2020.pdf</dcat:downloadURL>
        <dcat:mediaType>application/pdf</dcat:mediaType>
      </dcat:Distribution>
    </dcat:distribution>
  </rdf:Description>
  <foaf:Project rdf:about="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/670985/">
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">670985</dct:identifier>
    <dct:title>Form-frequency correspondences in grammar</dct:title>
    <frapo:isAwardedBy>
      <foaf:Organization>
        <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">10.13039/501100000780</dct:identifier>
        <foaf:name>European Commission</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Organization>
    </frapo:isAwardedBy>
  </foaf:Project>
</rdf:RDF>
74
47
views
downloads
Views 74
Downloads 47
Data volume 13.1 MB
Unique views 73
Unique downloads 43

Share

Cite as