Journal article Open Access

Manipulating Shadows: Towards an Evidentialist (Dis)solution of the Causal Exclusion Problem [Manipulando sombras: Hacia una (di)solución evidencialista del problema de la exclusión causal]

Baravalle, Lorenzo


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3594059</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Baravalle, Lorenzo</creatorName>
      <givenName>Lorenzo</givenName>
      <familyName>Baravalle</familyName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0001-6299-6403</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Manipulating Shadows: Towards an Evidentialist (Dis)solution of the Causal Exclusion Problem [Manipulando sombras: Hacia una (di)solución evidencialista del problema de la exclusión causal]</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2019</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Supervenience</subject>
    <subject>Causal Models</subject>
    <subject>Manipulationism</subject>
    <subject>Evidentialism</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2019-12-27</date>
  </dates>
  <language>es</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Journal article</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://disputatio.eu/vols/vol-8-no-11/baravalle-shadows/</alternateIdentifier>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/3594059</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="ISSN" relationType="IsCitedBy">2254-0601</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3594058</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/disputatio</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;A classic problem in philosophy of mind is the possible exclusion of mental causes with respect to the physical ones. This problem, popularised by Jaegwon Kim, has undesirable consequences for any scientific discipline committed with causal claims related to supervenient properties. Focusing on issues concerning causal claims in the special sciences, I discuss in this paper the solution to the causal exclusion problem put forward by a group of authors occasionally called &amp;laquo;evidentialists&amp;raquo;. Evidentialists consider that causal exclusion problem can be solved by appealing to the manipulationist notion of cause, originally formulated by James Woodward. Throughout the last 10 year, the evidentialist view has received some criticisms by Michael Baumgartner. My goal is to show in which respects these criticisms are correct, but do not compromise the overall validity of the evidentialist view.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>
32
94
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 3232
Downloads 9494
Data volume 49.2 MB49.2 MB
Unique views 3131
Unique downloads 7272

Share

Cite as