MEI 7: Seventh Conference on Research in Mathematics Education in Ireland
Published October 11, 2019 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

OPPORTUNITIES FOR YEAR-ONE CHILDREN TO ACQUIRE FOUNDATIONAL NUMBER SENSE: COMPARING ENGLISH AND SWEDISH ADAPTATIONS OF THE SAME SINGAPORE TEXTBOOK

Creators

  • 1. Stockholm University, Sweden
  • 2. Leeds University, UK

Description

We compare adaptations of a Singaporean year-one mathematics textbook for use in England and Sweden respectively. The texts were analysed in two different ways against the eight dimensions of Foundational Number Sense (FoNS), a set of core competences that the literature has shown to be necessary for year-one children’s later mathematical learning. The first analysis, based on frequencies, showed that neither adaptation incorporated any opportunities for children to acquire the two FoNS competence relating to estimation and number patterns respectively. They also showed that the English adaptation comprised significantly more tasks than the Swedish, particularly with respect to systematic counting, where the former comprised 26% more tasks than the latter. The second analysis, based on moving averages, showed that across five of the six FoNS categories for which there were data, the temporal location and emphases of FoNS-related learning were comparable, with, in particular, no such opportunities after the mid-point of the school year in either book. However, the English adaptation’s presentation of systematic counting, occurring at various points throughout the school year, was substantially different from the Swedish adaptation, highlighting differences due, we speculate, to interpretations of local didactical traditions.

Files

Petersson_J.pdf

Files (324.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7b5d741a9997748fd59499702e7a6234
324.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Andrews, P., & Sayers, J. (2015). Identifying opportunities for grade one children to acquire foundational number sense: developing a framework for cross cultural classroom analyses. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(4), 257-267.
  • Bråting, K., Madej, L., & Hemmi, K. (2019). Development of algebraic thinking: opportunities offered by the Swedish curriculum and elementary mathematics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 27-49.
  • Ding, M. (2016). Opportunities to learn: Inverse relations in U.S. and Chinese textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(1), 45-68.
  • Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590.
  • Harel, G., & Wilson, W. S. (2011). The state of high school textbooks. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(6), 823-826.
  • Huntley, M. A., & Terrell, M. S. (2014). One-step and multi-step linear equations: A content analysis of five textbook series. ZDM, 46(5), 751-766.
  • Kajander, A., & Lovric, M. (2009). Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 173-181.
  • Lembke, E., & Foegen, A. (2009). Identifying early numeracy indicators for kindergarten and first-grade students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(1), 12-20.
  • Libertus, M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2013). Is approximate number precision a stable predictor of math ability? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 126-133.
  • Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Preschool children's mapping of number words to nonsymbolic numerosities. Child Development, 76(5), 978-988.
  • McIntosh, A., Reys, B., & Reys, R. (1992). A proposed framework for examining basic number sense. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 2–8, 44.
  • Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks: An empirical approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2), 255-286.
  • Petersson, J., Sayers, J., Rosenqvist, E., & Andrews, P. (Under review). Teaching Mastery Mathematics: Comparing year one English mathematics textbooks through the lens of foundational number sense. British Educational Research Journal.
  • Rezat, S. (2006). The structures of German mathematics textbooks. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(6), 482-487.
  • Sayers, J., Petersson, J., Rosenqvist, E., & Andrews, P. (Under review). Opportunities to learn foundational number sense in three Swedish year one textbooks: Implications for the importation of overseas-authored materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
  • Tarr, J., Chávez, Ó., Reys, R., & Reys, B. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students' opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 191-201.
  • Wakaura, M., & Ogata, Y. (2007). A time series analysis on the seasonality of air temperature anomalies. Meteorological Applications, 14(4), 425-434.
  • Yang, D.-C., Reys, R., & Wu, L.-L. (2010). Comparing the development of fractions in the fifth- and sixth-graders' textbooks of Singapore, Taiwan, and the USA. School Science and Mathematics, 110(3), 118-127.