Conference paper Open Access

WHAT'S THE POINT: EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE BONUS POINTS INITIATIVE FOR MATHEMATICS

Niamh O'Meara; Mark Prendergast; Paraic Treacy


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., &amp; Brown, M. (2000). Students' experiences of ability grouping-disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British educational research journal, 26 (5), 631- 648.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Brown, M., Brown, P., &amp; Bibby, T. (2008). "I would rather die": Reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 10 (1), 3- 18.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Charbannier, É., &amp; Vayssettes, S. (2009). PISA 2009 Presentation Note (France). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available: www.oecd.org/pisa/46624019.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Chinnappan, M., Dinham, S., Herrington, A.J. &amp; Scott, D. (2008). Year 12 students' and higher mathematics: Emerging issues. In P. Jeffreys (Ed.), AARE 2007 International Educational Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 10-20). Freemantle: Association for Active Educational Researchers.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">DeWitt, J., Archer, L., &amp; Moote, J. (2018). 15/16-Year-Old Students' Reasons for Choosing and Not Choosing Physics at a Level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-17.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Garg, K. C., &amp; Gupta, B. M. (2003). Decline in science education in India–A case study at+ 2 and undergraduate level. Current Science, 84 (9), 1198-1201.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Goodrum, D., Druhan, A., &amp; Abbs, J. (2012). The status and quality of year 11 and 12 science in Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: Australian Academy of Science.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Hallam, S., &amp; Ireson, J. (2003). Secondary school teachers' attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 343-356.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Marks, R., &amp; Brown, M. (2018). Evidence for review of mathematics teaching: Improving mathematics in key stages two and three. London: Education Endowment Foundation.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., &amp; Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60 (2), 34-46.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Linchevski, L., &amp; Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you're learning, and I'll tell you how much you've learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 533-554.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Murphy, C., Lundy, L., Emerson, L., &amp; Kerr, K. (2013). Children's perceptions of primary science assessment in England and Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 39 (3), 585-606.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">National Commission on Mathematics, &amp; Science Teaching for the 21st Century (US). (2000). Before it's too late: A report of the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Diane Publishing Company.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Noyes, A. (2013). The effective mathematics department: Adding value and increasing participation?. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24 (1), 1-17.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">State Examinations Commission (SEC) 2018. State examinations statistics. Published: State Examinations Commission (SEC). Available from: https://www.examinations.ie/statistics/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Taylor, B., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Tereshchenko, A., &amp; Travers, M. C. (2017). Factors deterring schools from mixed attainment teaching practice. Pedagogy, Culture &amp; Society, 25(3), 327-345.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Treacy, P. T. (2018). Incentivizing advanced mathematics study at upper secondary level: the case of bonus points in Ireland. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49 (3), 417-436.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Veal, W. R., &amp; Flinders, D. J. (2001). How block scheduling reform effects classroom practice. The High School Journal, 84 (4), 21-31.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Wolf, A. (2002) Does education matther? Myths about education and econdomic growth. London, UK: Penguin.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120151110.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">3580865</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">University College Cork</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Mark Prendergast</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">University of Brighton</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Paraic Treacy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">307913</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:cf8c6ed7086973b7bc16fd5079bab89b</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/3580865/files/OMeara_N.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-10-11</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-mei7</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:3580865</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">EPISTEM, University of Limerick</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Niamh O'Meara</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">WHAT'S THE POINT: EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE BONUS POINTS INITIATIVE FOR MATHEMATICS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-mei7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Since 2012 mathematics has been assigned a special status within Irish post-primary education with the introduction of a Bonus Points initiative (BPI). Students are now awarded an extra 25 CAO points in their upper post-primary school state examination results if they achieve a passing grade at higher-level. These extra points will increase the likelihood of these students getting a place on the course of their choice at third level. This incentive was introduced to encourage students to study the subject at higher-level. Anecdotally there have been many mixed reviews about the success of the BPI. While the numbers taking HL mathematics have steadily increased, there have been concerns expressed that many students who are not mathematically capable of performing up to the standard required are now opting for the HL paper and that the difficulty of this examination and the marking schemes have been adjusted accordingly (Treacy, 2018). This paper reports on a national study, the first of its kind in Ireland, that was conducted to investigate teachers&amp;rsquo; perspectives (n = 266) on the BPI. The authors will investigate if the increase in the number of students studying higher-level mathematics in Ireland has occurred in tandem with an increase in the mathematical proficiency of post-primary students and will ascertain the impact of the BPI on the profile of higher-level mathematics classes. It will report on findings from a national study.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3580864</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">219-226</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Dublin, Ireland</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">978-1-873769-95-9</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">L. Harbison, &amp; A. Twohill (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Research in Mathematics Education in Ireland (MEI7)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3580865</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">conferencepaper</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
29
21
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 2929
Downloads 2121
Data volume 6.5 MB6.5 MB
Unique views 2828
Unique downloads 2020

Share

Cite as