Conference paper Open Access

What Makes an Image Tagger Fair? Proprietary Auto-tagging and Interpretations on People Images

Barlas Pinar; Kleanthous Styliani; Kyriakou Kyriakos; Otterbacher Jahna


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3522924</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Barlas Pinar</creatorName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-7882-7927</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>Research centre for Interactive media, Smart systems and Emerging technologies Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Kleanthous Styliani</creatorName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0003-1594-1340</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>Cyprus Center for Algorithmic Transparency Open University of Cyprus Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Kyriakou Kyriakos</creatorName>
      <affiliation>Research centre for Interactive media, Smart systems and Emerging technologies Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation>
    </creator>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Otterbacher Jahna</creatorName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="http://orcid.org/">0000-0002-7655-7118</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>Cyprus Center for Algorithmic Transparency Open University of Cyprus Nicosia, Cyprus</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>What Makes an Image Tagger Fair? Proprietary Auto-tagging and Interpretations on People Images</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2019</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>algorithmic bias</subject>
    <subject>computer vision</subject>
    <subject>fairness</subject>
    <subject>image analysis</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2019-10-30</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Conference paper</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/3522924</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3522923</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/rise-teaming-cyprus</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <version>Accepted pre-print</version>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;Image analysis algorithms have been a boon to personalization in digital systems and are now widely available via easy-to-use APIs.&lt;br&gt;
However, it is important to ensure that they behave fairly in applications that involve processing images of people, such as dating apps. We conduct an experiment to shed light on the factors influencing the perception of &amp;ldquo;fairness.&amp;quot; Participants are shown a photo along with two descriptions (human- and algorithm-generated). They are then asked to indicate which is &amp;ldquo;more fair&amp;quot; in the context of a dating site, and explain their reasoning. We vary a number of factors, including the gender, race and attractiveness of the person in the photo. While participants generally found human-generated tags to be more fair, API tags were judged as being more fair in one setting - where the image depicted an &amp;ldquo;attractive,&amp;quot; white individual. In their explanations, participants often mention accuracy, as well as the objectivity/subjectivity of the tags in the description. We relate our work to the ongoing conversation about fairness in opaque tools like image tagging APIs, and their potential to result in harm.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <description descriptionType="Other">This work has been partly supported by the project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 739578 (RISE – Call: H2020-WIDESPREAD-01-2016-2017-TeamingPhase2) and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus through the Directorate General for European Programmes, Coordination and Development.</description>
  </descriptions>
  <fundingReferences>
    <fundingReference>
      <funderName>European Commission</funderName>
      <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/501100000780</funderIdentifier>
      <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/810105/">810105</awardNumber>
      <awardTitle>Cyprus Center for Algorithmic Transparency</awardTitle>
    </fundingReference>
    <fundingReference>
      <funderName>European Commission</funderName>
      <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/501100000780</funderIdentifier>
      <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/739578/">739578</awardNumber>
      <awardTitle>Research Center on Interactive Media, Smart System and Emerging Technologies</awardTitle>
    </fundingReference>
  </fundingReferences>
</resource>
18
9
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 1819
Downloads 99
Data volume 49.7 MB49.7 MB
Unique views 1617
Unique downloads 88

Share

Cite as