Poster Open Access

Journal practices (other than OA) promoting Open Science goals

Bosman, Jeroen; Kramer, Bianca

Citation Style Language JSON Export

  "publisher": "Zenodo", 
  "DOI": "10.5281/zenodo.3518896", 
  "language": "eng", 
  "title": "Journal practices (other than OA) promoting Open Science goals", 
  "issued": {
    "date-parts": [
  "abstract": "<p><em>Poster presented at meeting &quot;Editorial boards and the transition to full open access&quot; - Utrecht University, October 25 2019</em></p>\n\n<p><em>shared in various formats (png, pdf, pptx, odp) for (re)use and modification</em></p>\n\n<p><strong>Journal practices (other than OA) promoting Open Science goals (relevance, reproducibility, efficiency, transparency)</strong></p>\n\n<ul>\n\t<li>Early, full and reproducible content\n\t<ul>\n\t\t<li>preregistration &ndash; use preregistrations in the review process</li>\n\t\t<li>registered reports &ndash; apply peer review to preregistration prior to the study and publish results regardless of outcomes</li>\n\t\t<li>preprint policy &ndash; liberally allow preprinting in any archive without license restrictions</li>\n\t\t<li>data/code availability &ndash; foster or require open availability of data and code for reviewers and readers</li>\n\t\t<li>TDM allowance &ndash; allow unrestricted TDM of full text and metadata for any use</li>\n\t\t<li>null/negative results &ndash; publish regardless of outcome<br>\n\t\t&nbsp;</li>\n\t</ul>\n\t</li>\n\t<li>Machine readable ecosystem\n\t<ul>\n\t\t<li>data/code citation &ndash; promote citation and use standards</li>\n\t\t<li>persistent IDs &ndash; e.g. DOI, ORCID, ROR, Open Funder Registry, grant IDs</li>\n\t\t<li>licenses (in Crossref) &ndash; register (open) licenses in Crossref</li>\n\t\t<li>contributorship roles &ndash; credit all contributors for their part in the work</li>\n\t\t<li>open citations &ndash; make citation information openly available via Crossref<br>\n\t\t&nbsp;</li>\n\t</ul>\n\t</li>\n\t<li>Peer review\n\t<ul>\n\t\t<li>open peer review &ndash; e.g. open reports and open identities</li>\n\t\t<li>peer review criteria &ndash; evaluate methodological rigour and reporting quality only or also judge expected relevance or impact?</li>\n\t\t<li>rejection rates &ndash; publish rejection rates and reconsider high selectivity</li>\n\t\t<li>post-publication peer review &ndash; publish immediately after sanity check and let peer review follow that?<br>\n\t\t&nbsp;</li>\n\t</ul>\n\t</li>\n\t<li>Diversity\n\t<ul>\n\t\t<li>author diversity &ndash; age, position, gender, geography, ethnicity, colour</li>\n\t\t<li>reviewer diversity &ndash; age, position, gender, geography, ethnicity, colour</li>\n\t\t<li>editor diversity &ndash; age, position, gender, geography, ethnicity, colour</li>\n\t</ul>\n\t</li>\n\t<li>\n\t<p>Metrics and DORA</p>\n\n\t<ul>\n\t\t<li>DORA: journal metrics &ndash; refrain from promoting</li>\n\t\t<li>DORA: article metrics &ndash; provide a range and use responsibly</li>\n\t</ul>\n\t</li>\n</ul>", 
  "author": [
      "family": "Bosman, Jeroen"
      "family": "Kramer, Bianca"
  "type": "graphic", 
  "id": "3518896"
All versions This version
Views 1,1271,126
Downloads 217217
Data volume 44.9 MB44.9 MB
Unique views 1,0611,060
Unique downloads 183183


Cite as