Conference paper Open Access

Comparative analysis of liquefaction susceptibility assessment by CPTu and SPT tests

Viana da Fonseca, António; Ferreira, Cristiana; Saldanha, Ana Sofia; Ramos, Catarina; Rodrigues, Carlos


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20191101191110.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">3465239</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">CONSTRUCT-GEO, Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5998-6220</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ferreira, Cristiana</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Saldanha, Ana Sofia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">CONSTRUCT-GEO, Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6679-8121</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ramos, Catarina</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Polytechnic Institute of Guarda, Guarda, Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Rodrigues, Carlos</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">700168</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:2a243643c2ec53fe516bfaaa8222ee40</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/3465239/files/VianadaFonsecaetal2018-CPT18.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-09-30</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:3465239</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">CONSTRUCT-GEO, Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9896-1410</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Viana da Fonseca, António</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparative analysis of liquefaction susceptibility assessment by CPTu and SPT tests</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">700748</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Assessment and mitigation of liquefaction potential across Europe: a holistic approach to protect structures / infrastructures for improved resilience to earthquake-induced liquefaction disasters</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 Generic</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;The assessment of liquefaction susceptibility from field tests is conventionally based on the factor of safety (FSliq) against liquefaction, relating the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) with the cyclic stress ratio (CSR). The calculation of CSR is relatively straightforward, whereas CRR strongly depends on the in situ technique from which it is derived. Distinct approaches have been proposed based on quantitative liquefaction risk in-dexes, namely the Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI) and the Liquefaction Severity Number (LSN). In Portugal, a pilot site for liquefaction assessment has been set up in the Lower Tagus Valley, near Lisbon, within the European H2020 LIQUEFACT project. In this paper, the geotechnical field data from SPT and CPTu is inte-grated in the three approaches to liquefaction assessment. A comparative analysis of the results is presented and discussed, highlighting the differences and limitations of these in situ tests in the assessment of liquefaction susceptibility in loose granular soils.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3465238</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3465239</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">conferencepaper</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
2
2
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 22
Downloads 22
Data volume 1.4 MB1.4 MB
Unique views 22
Unique downloads 22

Share

Cite as