Workflow Provider Name,Workflow Provider Type,Workflow Provider specialist research area if any,Deposit Initiator,"Ingest: Curation, Metadata, Documentation","Data administration support, formatting, PID",Review/QA,PublishDisseminate,Metrics
ENVRI reference model,guidelines,Environmental sciences,Project,"Process is in development, looking for standards",PID generator included,Possibly - still in development,Not defined,
PREPARDE,guidelines,Earth sciences,Researcher,depends on the repository in question,DOI preferred,Part of Data Paper review process to establish if data meets 'community fit for purpose' standards,as part of Data Paper cross-linking ,cites as part of publication process. Usage may be part of repository service
Ocean Data Publication Cookbook,guidelines,marine sciences,Researcher,"metadata recommendations specified needs to be ""sufficient""",Recommendations on formats/standards. DOI,"Data for BODC, yes.Ê MBLWHOI, yes for BCO-DMO deposits","Metadata - yes, both.",Both repositories are indexed by Data Citation Index and keep track internally of downloads.
"Scientific Data, Nature Publishing Group",journal,,Researcher,SD has standardised tools also inhouse support to check/advise. Will check repository credentials,Formatting support and DOI,By Editorial Board/selected reviewers according to community standards,officially linked with the Data Descriptor article,citation mentioned but not the specifics
F1000Research,journal,Life sciences,Researcher,editorial team provides support,DOI,peer reviewers submit reports after publication,citations,recommended
Ubiquity Press OHDJ,journal,"Life, health and social sciences",Researcher,metadata review,prefer non-proprietary formats,formal scientific peer review process according to 'disciplinary norms',"Google Scholar, Hope for PubMed, CrossRef, DOAJ, etc",
GigaScience,journal,Life and biomedical sciences,Researcher,technical review by a biocurator,peer reviewers asked to confirm if formats appropriate    DOI ,not sure,"Data Citation Index, galaxy database",for data papers but not datasets?
Data in Brief,journal,,Researcher,"data paper template provided, metadata ""probably"" checked",DOI or other PID as per repository,peer review prior to acceptance,link via paper,for data paper
"Earth System Science Data Journal, Copernicus Publications",journal,Earth sciences,Researcher,editorial team provides support in data paper preparation which is the documentaiton literally. Data submission to qualified repositories. ,*,"Yes, Open peer review for data paper. This includes data review as well. The peer review secures that the data sets are the following:
at least plausible and contain no detectable  problems;of sufficiently high quality and their limitations are clearly stated;openly accessible (cost-free for readers), well annotated by  
standard metadata (e.g. ISO 19115), and available from a certified data  center/repository;customary with regard to their format(s) and/or access 
protocol, however not proprietary ones (e.g. Open Geospatial Consortium 
standards), expected to be usable for the foreseeable future.",Data journal which references the repository entry. Now indexed by JCR by Thomson Reuters so Journal will get an Impact Factor. ,"Copernicus uses altmetrics. Also, see above: now indexed by Thomson Reuters. "
Science and Technology Facilities Council Data centre,repository,Physics and space sciences,Researcher,"Depends on nature of the depositor (dumping, pro-active, etc). Also depends on future needs. Can be interactive. Metadata support",Formatting for preservation. Embargoes applied. DOI if appropriate.,Technical for integrity,Project and Author are alerted. Entered into catalogue,
National Snow and Ice Data Center,repository,Polar Sciences,Project or Researcher,"Level of service depends. At lowest level, metadata is validated",Stable URL for landing page as well as DOI if desired,Internal review for all products per level of service; DAAC data sets undergo review by the DAAC User Working Group (an external advisory body),"Variety of catalogues, Data Dictionary Portals, relevant projects",
INSPIRE Digital library,repository,High energy Physics,Researcher,curator from the INSPIRE team build the core metadata,DOI,"happens within the researchers team first (HEP is known for thorough internal review systems), plus metadata QA on INSPIRE side",index on INSPIRE which is the main community plattform. Shown on author page. ,citation measured [data citation reocmmendation is show; data citation is tracked based on handle/doi]
UK Data Archive (ODIN),repository,Social sciences,Researcher,information given is more social than technical. ORCID is encouraged,DOI/ARK/Handle/URN all accepted,validation of name authority file only,Not specified - this was a wide-ranging project with a variety of partners,identified impact assessment and dissemination tools and measures as key
PURR Institutional Repository,repository,,Researcher or Repository,metadata specialist assigned,recommendations supplied. To be assessed as ISO level trustworthy,librarians,catalogue,
ICPSR,repository,Social and behavioural sciences,"Researcher, Acquisitions officer or Funder",curators and librarians write descriptions,advice given on formats appropriate for preservation andd dissemination DOI,data curators do technical checks,"index on site, Data Citation Index, Google, OPACs",
Edinburgh Datashare,repository,,Researcher assisted by librarian,support given to complete metadata,"currently allocates handles, going to be DOIs. Formatting recommendations are given",technical checks,Data Citation Index,
PANGAEA,repository,Earth sciences,Researcher,some checks for outliers. Metadata and uploading assistance,formatting for import/publication   DOI,"technical review provided, peer review supported but not supplied","PANGAEA catalogue, various portals",
WDC Climate,repository,Environmental sciences,Project or Researcher,metadata review by data manager/creator,DOI,Technical QA by data manager,"Own portal plus others, e.g. ICSU",
CMIP/IPCC-DCC,repository,Climate sciences,Project,"controlled vocabulary (CMIP) Author approval required, metadata QA by data manager/creator","standard formats required (CMIP), Handle (CMIP), DOI (IPCC-DDC)",QA and review by community. CMIP-ongoing checking. IPCC- technical QA by data manager,"CMIP-ESGF portals, community  index. IPCC-DDC hosted by WDC Climate (uses WDCC portal)",
Dryad Digital Repository,repository,,Researcher,"Metadata review, baseline curation","Most files types accepted. Guidance provided on open, non-proprietarty formats and how to optimise reanalysis and re-use","All data is associated with peer-reviewed publications, and is expected to be reviewed alongside the article","DOIs, linked to articles","Dryad counts data package views and data file views and downloads, and displays this information on each data package and data file page"
Stanford Digital Repository,repository,,Researcher,"several options, including self-service. Repository does basic checks, some required fields",some support on formatting for preservation. PURL with DRUID,"not typically, can be supported if required","library catalogue, crawled by Google",
Academic Commons Columbia,repository,,Researcher or Repository,"Collection policy for curation, DataCite basic metadata with some optional elements, documentation as provided by the depositor","All file formats are accepted. DataCite DOIs provided, previously hdls were provided. Guidance is available on formats & optimization for reuse.",Currently no review of content by repository staff. Peer review can be supported. Generate initial checksums. Review basic metadata.,"Indexed: on site, Google (optimized), Google Scholar, DataCite, COAR, and the library catalogue. Available through OAI-PMH. Working with Data Citation Index",Download & Click metrics provided to author monthly
Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM),repository,,Researcher,"all data curated pre and post ingest. Pre ingest, data reviewed for meeting our policy and accepted/rejected. Post-ingest one of our data curators (depending on type of data) reviews the data for missing info, metadata, quality issues, adequate documentation (template provided), run code, reformate files, etc.","All files types accepted, some are transfored into a preservation copy (both kept), Datacite DOI minted. Handles also generated by DSpace (repository software)","Yes, review by data curators (library staff with data type expertise, eg. GIS data or statistical data). QA is on a case by case basis and questions about the data are given to the author.",Full text indexed by repository software discoverable by web search engines; submissions get indeded by Web Of Science Data Citation index. OAI metadata harvestable by anyone. We also have an API.,Download stats at the file level available for each submission.
ARKIVUM and Figshare,repository,,Researcher,Metadata is as required/supported by Figshare or as required by DataCite for DOIs.  An institution can add their own required metadata fields in the institutional version of Figshare.,DOI minted by Figshare using DataCite.  DOI resolves to Figshare.   Files are transferred'behind the scenes' to Arkivum for long-term storage.  ,"QA done by institution separately to researcher use of Figshare, e.g. metadata harvested from Figshare into institution's CRIS or IR and then put through institution QA process.  Researcher asked to update Figshare if needed.",Data discoverable through Figshare.  Data accessed through Figshare.  Data retrieved from archive on demand and made available to users through Figshare.,Figshare metrics.  Also Arkivum file access stats. 
"OJS/ Dataverse
Data repository",repository,,Researcher,Not clear where metadata is generated or what other ingest procedures are included,DOI,"Possibly, not specified","Indexed, linked to papers, search engine optimised",downloads measured