Book section Open Access

Deriving an object dislocation asymmetry in Luganda

Rodrigo Ranero


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3367189</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Rodrigo Ranero</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University of Maryland</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Deriving an object dislocation asymmetry in Luganda</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2019</publicationYear>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2019-08-13</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">Book section</resourceType>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/3367189</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3367188</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/langscipress</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;In this paper, I document and analyze an object-dislocation asymmetry in Luganda&lt;br&gt;
(Bantu: JE15) that becomes apparent only upon comparing double object left-dislo-&lt;br&gt;
cation versus double object right-dislocation. If two objects are left-dislocated, the&lt;br&gt;
object markers (OMs) on the verb are strictly ordered OMTHEME &amp;gt; OMGOAL/BEN and&lt;br&gt;
the dislocated objects are ordered freely, either goal/ben &amp;gt; theme or theme &amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
goal/ben. In contrast, if two objects are right-dislocated, the objects cannot be&lt;br&gt;
freely ordered &amp;mdash; two right-dislocated objects must be ordered goal/ben &amp;gt; theme.&lt;br&gt;
However, in double object right-dislocation, the OMs must also be ordered OMTHEME&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; OMGOAL/BEN . I propose that this asymmetry can be captured if left-dislocated ob-&lt;br&gt;
jects are base generated in their surface position, whereas right-dislocated objects&lt;br&gt;
are derived via movement. Several predictions concerning binding and superiority&lt;br&gt;
effects are borne out, providing support for the analysis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>
54
23
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 5454
Downloads 2323
Data volume 5.4 MB5.4 MB
Unique views 4747
Unique downloads 2020

Share

Cite as