Dataset Open Access

Bibliography on criteria for assessing the quality of scientific publications

Herb, Ulrich


JSON-LD (schema.org) Export

{
  "description": "<p>The data deposited here consist of references to literature that was evaluated during the development of&nbsp; a qualitative survey and an online questionnaire on the qualitative perception of scientific publications.</p>\n\n<p>In preparation for these qualitative interviews and the online survey, a literature study on the qualitative perceptions of scientific literature was conducted in January and February 2018.&nbsp; The focus was on the question which internal characteristics, i.e. in the narrower sense content-related factors, influence the perception of a publication as qualitatively valuable or poor. External characteristics as citation counts should not be at the centre of the research - knowing that they control qualitative perception - since their effect on the perception of the quality of a publication is sufficiently discussed (see e.g. Dong, Loh, &amp; Mondry, 2005).<br>\nThe literature study was based on the results of a search in the databases Web of Science, Scopus, Library, Information Science &amp; Technology Abstracts and the search engine Google Scholar.</p>\n\n<p>VisOA_full_results.bib includes references that were considered valuable in principle, VisOA.bib only those that have been considered in the development of the survey instruments.</p>", 
  "license": "http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode", 
  "creator": [
    {
      "affiliation": "Saarland University, ./scidecode science consulting & research", 
      "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3500-3119", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Herb, Ulrich"
    }
  ], 
  "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/3366168", 
  "datePublished": "2019-08-12", 
  "keywords": [
    "Quality", 
    "Scientific Literature", 
    "Science", 
    "Publications", 
    "Literature Study"
  ], 
  "@context": "https://schema.org/", 
  "distribution": [
    {
      "contentUrl": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/06267136-6553-47d3-b1cc-a0790059450d/VisOA.bib", 
      "@type": "DataDownload", 
      "fileFormat": "bib"
    }, 
    {
      "contentUrl": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/06267136-6553-47d3-b1cc-a0790059450d/VisOA_full_results.bib", 
      "@type": "DataDownload", 
      "fileFormat": "bib"
    }
  ], 
  "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3366168", 
  "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3366168", 
  "@type": "Dataset", 
  "name": "Bibliography on criteria for assessing the quality of scientific publications"
}
123
28
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 123123
Downloads 2828
Data volume 532.3 kB532.3 kB
Unique views 105105
Unique downloads 1717

Share

Cite as