Dataset Open Access

Bibliography on criteria for assessing the quality of scientific publications

Herb, Ulrich

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="" xmlns="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3366168</identifier>
      <creatorName>Herb, Ulrich</creatorName>
      <nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ORCID" schemeURI="">0000-0002-3500-3119</nameIdentifier>
      <affiliation>Saarland University, ./scidecode science consulting &amp; research</affiliation>
    <title>Bibliography on criteria for assessing the quality of scientific publications</title>
    <subject>Scientific Literature</subject>
    <subject>Literature Study</subject>
    <date dateType="Issued">2019-08-12</date>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Dataset"/>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url"></alternateIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="Compiles" resourceTypeGeneral="Text">10.5281/zenodo.3482888</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="Compiles" resourceTypeGeneral="Text">10.5281/zenodo.3482860</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.3366167</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf"></relatedIdentifier>
    <rights rightsURI="">Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;The data deposited here consist of references to literature that was evaluated during the development of&amp;nbsp; a qualitative survey and an online questionnaire on the qualitative perception of scientific publications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In preparation for these qualitative interviews and the online survey, a literature study on the qualitative perceptions of scientific literature was conducted in January and February 2018.&amp;nbsp; The focus was on the question which internal characteristics, i.e. in the narrower sense content-related factors, influence the perception of a publication as qualitatively valuable or poor. External characteristics as citation counts should not be at the centre of the research - knowing that they control qualitative perception - since their effect on the perception of the quality of a publication is sufficiently discussed (see e.g. Dong, Loh, &amp;amp; Mondry, 2005).&lt;br&gt;
The literature study was based on the results of a search in the databases Web of Science, Scopus, Library, Information Science &amp;amp; Technology Abstracts and the search engine Google Scholar.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VisOA_full_results.bib includes references that were considered valuable in principle, VisOA.bib only those that have been considered in the development of the survey instruments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <description descriptionType="Other">Gefördert vom Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
"Förderrichtlinie des freien Informationsflusses in der Wissenschaft – Open Access
des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)"
Vorhaben: Sichtbarmachung von Open-Access-Publikationen in den Nachweisinstrumenten einer Bibliothek - visOA
Ausführende Stelle: Leibniz-Institut für Neue Materialien gGmbH (INM)
Projektleitung: Uwe Geith
Förderkennzeichen: 16OA060

Funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
"Programme for the Free Flow of Information in Science - Open Access
of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)"
Project: Making Open Access publications visible in the holdings of a library - visOA
Executing authority: Leibniz Institute for New Materials gGmbH (INM)
Project Management: Uwe Geith
Grant reference number: 16OA060</description>
All versions This version
Views 829829
Downloads 6060
Data volume 1.1 MB1.1 MB
Unique views 793793
Unique downloads 4242


Cite as