{ "access": { "embargo": { "active": false, "reason": null }, "files": "public", "record": "public", "status": "open" }, "created": "2019-07-06T11:17:34.780355+00:00", "custom_fields": {}, "deletion_status": { "is_deleted": false, "status": "P" }, "files": { "count": 1, "enabled": true, "entries": { "reproducibility_by_other_means.pdf": { "checksum": "md5:b60250e58dccde03cb32c172b5c019f8", "ext": "pdf", "id": "39e3296d-0f6f-4999-9ea6-8b7c599a8abd", "key": "reproducibility_by_other_means.pdf", "metadata": null, "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 430013 } }, "order": [], "total_bytes": 430013 }, "id": "3270560", "is_draft": false, "is_published": true, "links": { "access": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/access", "access_links": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/access/links", "access_request": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/access/request", "access_users": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/access/users", "archive": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/files-archive", "archive_media": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/media-files-archive", "communities": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/communities", "communities-suggestions": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/communities-suggestions", "doi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3270560", "draft": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/draft", "files": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/files", "latest": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/versions/latest", "latest_html": "https://zenodo.org/records/3270560/latest", "media_files": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/media-files", "parent": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270559", "parent_doi": "https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.3270559", "parent_html": "https://zenodo.org/records/3270559", "requests": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/requests", "reserve_doi": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/draft/pids/doi", "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560", "self_doi": "https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.3270560", "self_html": "https://zenodo.org/records/3270560", "self_iiif_manifest": "https://zenodo.org/api/iiif/record:3270560/manifest", "self_iiif_sequence": "https://zenodo.org/api/iiif/record:3270560/sequence/default", "versions": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3270560/versions" }, "media_files": { "count": 0, "enabled": false, "entries": {}, "order": [], "total_bytes": 0 }, "metadata": { "additional_descriptions": [ { "description": "Preprint submitted to RO2019 workshop at IEEE eScience Conference 2019", "type": { "id": "notes", "title": { "de": "Anmerkungen", "en": "Notes" } } } ], "creators": [ { "affiliations": [ { "name": "UIUC" } ], "person_or_org": { "family_name": "McPhillips", "given_name": "Timothy", "name": "McPhillips, Timothy", "type": "personal" } }, { "affiliations": [ { "name": "UIUC" } ], "person_or_org": { "family_name": "Ludaescher", "given_name": "Bertram", "name": "Ludaescher, Bertram", "type": "personal" } } ], "description": "
Abstract
\nResearch Objects have the potential to significantly enhance the reproducibility and transparency of scientific research. One important way Research Objects can do this is by encapsulating the means for re-executing the computational components of studies, thus supporting the new form of reproducibility enabled by digital computing---exact repeatability. However, Research Objects also can make scientific research more reproducible by supporting transparency, a component of reproducibility orthogonal to re-executability. We describe here our vision for making Research Objects more transparent by providing means for disambiguating claims about reproducibility generally, and computational repeatability specifically. We show how support for science-oriented queries can enable researchers to assess the reproducibility of Research Objects and the individual methods and results they encapsulate.
This Zenodo community welcomes submissions of preprints, Open Access articles and presentation and any FAIR Research Data packing formats (e.g. Research Objects, RO-Crate, BagIt, COMBINE archive), covering topics including, but not limited to:
Research Object publication, archiving and curation
Research Object creation and manipulation
Research Object exploration and visualization
Research Object evolution, derivation and provenance
Handling Big Data in Research Objects
Data Archive packaging and formats
Rich metadata of research data and software
Alignments with community efforts
Citation and attribution of research data and software
Annotation and peer review of research data
Distributed data publication (blockchain, nanopublication)
Driving adoption within current scholarly communications ecosystem
Research Object model domain extensions
Research Object granular access control approaches
Research Object social impact metrics
Self-contained executable Research Objects (i.e., including execution environment description)
Submissions must use an open license, if you are not sure use Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (for text, figures, data, metadata) or Apache License 2.0 (for software, workflows, scripts).
", "description": "For and about Research Objects using the RO-Crate standard, classic RO ontologies and other related work on scholarly communication.", "organizations": [ { "id": "027m9bs27" }, { "id": "00rqy9422" } ], "page": "Scholarly Communication has evolved significantly in recent years, with an increasing focus on Open Research, data sharing and community-developed open source methods. The concepts of authorship and citation are changing, as researchers are increasingly reusing and evolving common software tools and datasets. Yet with a growing amount of cloud compute power and open platforms available, reproducibility of computational analyses becomes more challenging, and often overlooked in peer review. While recent advances in scientific workflows and provenance capture systems have improved on this situation, a question remains on how to publish, archive and explore digital research outputs, as academic authors and publishers remain focused on PDFs and the occasional CSV file, with the Web and Open Research often left to \"best effort\" rather than being the expected norm.
To this mean the community initiative Research Object (RO) have been proposed as a way to package and describe research outputs, data, methods, workflows, provenance and structured metadata, reusing existing Web standards and formats.