Published June 13, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Training of adult psychiatrists and child and adolescent psychiatrists in europe: a systematic review of training characteristics and transition from child/adolescent to adult mental health services

  • 1. CHU Montpellier-Saint Eloi, Médecine Psychologique de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, 80, Av Fliche, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
  • 2. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 3. University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
  • 4. Department of Neurosciences, Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • 5. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Medical Science and Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 6. Yulius Academy, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 7. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
  • 8. Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
  • 9. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
  • 10. Psychiatric Epidemiology and Evaluation Unit, Saint John of God Clinical Research Centre, Brescia, Italy

Description

Background: Profound clinical, conceptual and ideological differences between child and adult mental health service models contribute to transition-related discontinuity of care. Many of these may be related to psychiatry training.

Methods: A systematic review on General Adult Psychiatry (GAP) and Child and Adult Psychiatry (CAP) training in Europe, with a particular focus on transition as a theme in GAP and CAP training.

Results: Thirty-four full-papers, six abstracts and seven additional full text documents were identified. Important variations between countries were found across several domains including assessment of trainees, clinical and educational supervision, psychotherapy training and continuing medical education. Three models of training were identified: i) a generalist common training programme; ii) totally separate training programmes; iii) mixed types. Only two national training programs (UK and Ireland) were identified to have addressed transition as a topic, both involving CAP exclusively.

Conclusion: Three models of training in GAP and CAP across Europe are identified, suggesting that the harmonization is not yet realised and a possible barrier to improving transitional care. Training in transition has only recently been considered. It is timely, topical and important to develop evidence-based training approaches on transitional care across Europe into both CAP and GAP training.

Files

12909_2019_Article_1576.pdf

Files (2.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1537a9ef0ddef40f114a9a4c5b9ccae1
102.9 kB Download
md5:3942842675fe2e258d333ffda676f814
40.4 kB Download
md5:240b18a1caebab7f5026053b8b9b0e52
41.0 kB Download
md5:6f5137e56219a4612ac546f6a5c650fe
42.5 kB Download
md5:9dc07f1084d46846d664fde786dfccd8
40.4 kB Download
md5:c03e75325d69fa6ceae637d2c4b29e81
2.3 MB Preview Download
md5:55565be5074956ef547374ed33444475
42.7 kB Download

Additional details

Funding

MILESTONE – THE MILESTONE PROJECT: Managing the Link and Strengthening Transition from Child to Adult Mental Health Care 602442
European Commission