Reichmann, Stefan
Ross-Hellauer, Tony
Hindle, Samantha
McDowell, Gary
Lin, Jennifer
Penfold, Naomi
Polka, Jessica
2019-05-05
<p>We used criteria associated with the Transpose database to evaluate policies in 171 of the most highly-cited journals across disciplines. We found that nearly one third don’t clearly state even basic information about the editorial process, such as whether peer review is blinded.</p>
<p>These findings represent preliminary results of the Transpose landscape study.</p>
This work was supported in part by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3237242
oai:zenodo.org:3237242
eng
Zenodo
https://osf.io/nsx78
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3237241
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
peer review
preprint
scholarly communication
Editorial policies of many highly-cited journals are hidden or unclear
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePoster