Published December 1, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Fulani cattle productivity and management in the Kachia Grazing Reserve, Nigeria

  • 1. Division of Infection and Pathway Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK
  • 2. Livestock and Poultry Research Centre, College of Basic and Applied Sciences, University of Ghana, P. O. Box LG 38, Accra, Ghana
  • 3. Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, No 1 Surame Road, Ungwan Rimi G.R.A., P.M.B, 2077, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • 4. Brucellosis Research Unit, Bacterial Research Division, National Veterinary Research Institute, P.M.B. 01, Vom, Plateau State, 930001, Nigeria

Description

Kachia Grazing Reserve (KGR) in northern Nigeria was home to some 10,000 Fulani pastoralists and their 40,000 cattle in June 2011. This study examines productivity and management of cattle belonging to livestock keepers within the reserve before and after a mass immigration event when 3,000 refugees moved into the reserve with their cattle to escape inter-community violence during May 2011. Data, on livestock management strategies (transhumance) and production parameters (herd size, composition, fertility, dynamics), were collected in March, June and October 2011.

Cattle productivity in KGR is geared to supporting Fulani households while maintaining herd wealth. High offtake of young animals, especially the selling of heifers, was an unusual finding and may indicate that KGR pastoralists have been restricting their herd size voluntarily as well as limiting milk production to household requirements. This is probably due to the absence of a commercial milk market and a higher reliance on the sale of young stock to meet cash needs.

Despite the widespread perception that grazing reserves are promoting sedentarisation of Fulani pastoralists and curbing transhumance, the inhabitants of the KGR were observed to practise wide-ranging transhumance both during wet and dry seasons driven by the limited availability of grazing. Some households selected a sub-sample of animals for transhumance rather than sending their whole herd, and some maintained cattle on alternative land-holdings outside the reserve. KGR households described modifying their usual transhumance practices in response to the mass immigration event and insecurity.

Nevertheless, the herd demography results from this study are broadly similar to data obtained from other studies over the past 40 years, indicating that productivity and management practices have remained relatively unchanged.

Files

13570_2016_Article_72.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:06a943975d9d9f49da1d81980ff958c2
1.2 MB Preview Download
md5:561b822d74a5ab4f1bc7a6ec9505370d
19.3 kB Download

Additional details

Funding

ICONZ – Integrated control of neglected zoonoses: improving human health and animal production through scientific innovation and public engagement 221948
European Commission