Journal article Open Access

Cost-benefit analysis of liquefaction mitigation strategies

Keith Jones,; Mariantonietta Morga; Nadeeshani Wanigarathna; Federica Pascale


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">cost-benefit modelling;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">disaster management</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">community resilience</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">liquefaction</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ground mitigation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">contingency planning</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">built asset management.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120164641.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">3049007</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Anglia Ruskin University</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Mariantonietta Morga</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Anglia Ruskin University</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Nadeeshani Wanigarathna</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Anglia Ruskin University</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Federica Pascale</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">363532</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:e9ed871e3c8dccd8a79167a9f538e297</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/3049007/files/Jones IABSE2019_GUIMARAES.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-05-20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:3049007</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Anglia Ruskin University</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Keith Jones,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cost-benefit analysis of liquefaction mitigation strategies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">700748</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Assessment and mitigation of liquefaction potential across Europe: a holistic approach to protect structures / infrastructures for improved resilience to earthquake-induced liquefaction disasters</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;This paper presents a cost-benefit model as part of the options appraisal process to evaluate&lt;br&gt;
alternative ground mitigation interventions to reduce vulnerability and/or improve resilience of&lt;br&gt;
built assets to earthquake induced liquefaction disaster (EILD) events. The paper presents a review&lt;br&gt;
of alternative approaches to cost-benefit analysis and develops forward looking (risk based) and&lt;br&gt;
backward looking (impact based) cost-benefit models that can be used by practitioners and policy&lt;br&gt;
makers to improve community resilience through better contingency and disaster management&lt;br&gt;
planning. The paper customises the models against EILD scenarios and identifies the cost and benefit&lt;br&gt;
attributes that need to be assessed if the models are to be effectively integrated into a resilience&lt;br&gt;
assessment and improvement framework for improved community resilience to EILD events.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3049006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.3049007</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
47
39
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 4747
Downloads 3939
Data volume 14.2 MB14.2 MB
Unique views 4646
Unique downloads 3939

Share

Cite as