Journal article Open Access
Keith Jones,; Mariantonietta Morga; Nadeeshani Wanigarathna; Federica Pascale
{ "files": [ { "links": { "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/7b3a9f13-fc59-4b12-ba13-afb7ebfa6fe7/Jones%20IABSE2019_GUIMARAES.pdf" }, "checksum": "md5:e9ed871e3c8dccd8a79167a9f538e297", "bucket": "7b3a9f13-fc59-4b12-ba13-afb7ebfa6fe7", "key": "Jones IABSE2019_GUIMARAES.pdf", "type": "pdf", "size": 363532 } ], "owners": [ 67738 ], "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.3049007", "stats": { "version_unique_downloads": 39.0, "unique_views": 46.0, "views": 47.0, "version_views": 47.0, "unique_downloads": 39.0, "version_unique_views": 46.0, "volume": 14177748.0, "version_downloads": 39.0, "downloads": 39.0, "version_volume": 14177748.0 }, "links": { "doi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3049007", "conceptdoi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3049006", "bucket": "https://zenodo.org/api/files/7b3a9f13-fc59-4b12-ba13-afb7ebfa6fe7", "conceptbadge": "https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.5281/zenodo.3049006.svg", "html": "https://zenodo.org/record/3049007", "latest_html": "https://zenodo.org/record/3049007", "badge": "https://zenodo.org/badge/doi/10.5281/zenodo.3049007.svg", "latest": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/3049007" }, "conceptdoi": "10.5281/zenodo.3049006", "created": "2019-05-20T08:54:13.296479+00:00", "updated": "2020-01-20T16:46:41.551824+00:00", "conceptrecid": "3049006", "revision": 4, "id": 3049007, "metadata": { "access_right_category": "success", "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.3049007", "description": "<p>This paper presents a cost-benefit model as part of the options appraisal process to evaluate<br>\nalternative ground mitigation interventions to reduce vulnerability and/or improve resilience of<br>\nbuilt assets to earthquake induced liquefaction disaster (EILD) events. The paper presents a review<br>\nof alternative approaches to cost-benefit analysis and develops forward looking (risk based) and<br>\nbackward looking (impact based) cost-benefit models that can be used by practitioners and policy<br>\nmakers to improve community resilience through better contingency and disaster management<br>\nplanning. The paper customises the models against EILD scenarios and identifies the cost and benefit<br>\nattributes that need to be assessed if the models are to be effectively integrated into a resilience<br>\nassessment and improvement framework for improved community resilience to EILD events.</p>", "license": { "id": "CC-BY-4.0" }, "title": "Cost-benefit analysis of liquefaction mitigation strategies", "relations": { "version": [ { "count": 1, "index": 0, "parent": { "pid_type": "recid", "pid_value": "3049006" }, "is_last": true, "last_child": { "pid_type": "recid", "pid_value": "3049007" } } ] }, "grants": [ { "code": "700748", "links": { "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/grants/10.13039/501100000780::700748" }, "title": "Assessment and mitigation of liquefaction potential across Europe: a holistic approach to protect structures / infrastructures for improved resilience to earthquake-induced liquefaction disasters", "acronym": "LIQUEFACT", "program": "H2020", "funder": { "doi": "10.13039/501100000780", "acronyms": [], "name": "European Commission", "links": { "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/funders/10.13039/501100000780" } } } ], "keywords": [ "cost-benefit modelling;", "disaster management", "community resilience", "liquefaction", "ground mitigation", "contingency planning", "built asset management." ], "publication_date": "2019-05-20", "creators": [ { "affiliation": "Anglia Ruskin University", "name": "Keith Jones," }, { "affiliation": "Anglia Ruskin University", "name": "Mariantonietta Morga" }, { "affiliation": "Anglia Ruskin University", "name": "Nadeeshani Wanigarathna" }, { "affiliation": "Anglia Ruskin University", "name": "Federica Pascale" } ], "access_right": "open", "resource_type": { "subtype": "article", "type": "publication", "title": "Journal article" }, "related_identifiers": [ { "scheme": "doi", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.3049006", "relation": "isVersionOf" } ] } }
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 47 | 47 |
Downloads | 39 | 39 |
Data volume | 14.2 MB | 14.2 MB |
Unique views | 46 | 46 |
Unique downloads | 39 | 39 |