Journal article Open Access

Double Bind at the UN: Western Actors, Russia, and the Traditionalist Agenda

Stoeckl, Kristina; Medvedeva, Kseniya


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Human Rights</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Liberalism</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Russia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Traditional Values</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">United Nations</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120171946.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">2869896</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1055-3640</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Medvedeva, Kseniya</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">418807</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:af3048149f268b39c24d5bfc4e80e1ba</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/2869896/files/Double Bind AM Version.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2018-11-01</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-postsecularconflicts</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:2869896</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">383-421</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">3</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Global Constitutionalism</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">7</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5043-2977</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Stoeckl, Kristina</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Double Bind at the UN: Western Actors, Russia, and the Traditionalist Agenda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-postsecularconflicts</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">676804</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Postsecular Conflicts and the role of Russian Orthodoxy in the transnational alliances of moral conservative traditionalists</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">License Not Specified</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;This article is dedicated to analysis of the traditionalist agenda, promoted&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;by Russia, in recent debates in the United Nations Human Rights Council&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(&amp;lsquo;Traditional values&amp;rsquo; from 2009 to 2013, &amp;lsquo;Protection of the family&amp;rsquo; from 2014 to&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2017). The traditionalist agenda could be interpreted as yet another chapter of&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;contextualist opposition to the universalist application human of rights and as a&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;successor to the cultural relativism in human rights promoted in the past by the&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Organization of Islamic States or countries from the Global South. This article&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;seeks to challenge such an interpretation and instead makes the argument that the&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;traditionalist agenda employs novel aspects of illiberal norm protagonism in the&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;human rights sphere. The article undertakes an in-depth analysis of the discourse&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;coalitions of both supporters and opponents of the traditionalist agenda, using the&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;tools of discourse analysis in international relations and drawing on a constructivist&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;approach to norm diffusion in international organisations.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1017/S2045381718000163</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
337
265
views
downloads
Views 337
Downloads 265
Data volume 111.0 MB
Unique views 305
Unique downloads 250

Share

Cite as