Preprint Open Access
Höchenberger, Richard;
Ohla, Kathrin
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"> <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">smell sensitivity</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">olfaction</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">threshold</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">staircase</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">QUEST</subfield> </datafield> <controlfield tag="005">20200120173145.0</controlfield> <controlfield tag="001">2840358</controlfield> <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="u">Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-3, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Psychophysiology of Food Perception, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany</subfield> <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-7265-0449</subfield> <subfield code="a">Ohla, Kathrin</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "> <subfield code="s">20168</subfield> <subfield code="z">md5:78dd3eb3f3b1ebe3e6d057ce0c1513f9</subfield> <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/2840358/files/Hoechenberger_Ohla_2019_All_Data.xlsx</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "> <subfield code="s">2295875</subfield> <subfield code="z">md5:6d0d78631911af5b73299ef8f6dcd5d2</subfield> <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/2840358/files/Hoechenberger & Ohla - Estimation of Olfactory Sensitivity Using a Bayesian Adaptive Method - Preprint - Rev 2.pdf</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "> <subfield code="s">4558582</subfield> <subfield code="z">md5:cc0e17a56e6c70848221e3dad5c73785</subfield> <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/2840358/files/Threshold_Trial_Sequence_Figures.zip</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="l">open</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="c">2019-05-15</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O"> <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield> <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:2840358</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="u">Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-3, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Psychophysiology of Food Perception, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany</subfield> <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-0380-4798</subfield> <subfield code="a">Höchenberger, Richard</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">Estimation of olfactory sensitivity using a Bayesian adaptive method</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield> <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7"> <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield> <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a"><p>The ability to smell is crucial for most species as it enables the detection of environmental&nbsp;threats like smoke, fosters social interactions, and contributes to the sensory evaluation of food&nbsp;and eating behavior. The high prevalence of smell disturbances throughout the life span calls&nbsp;for a continuous effort to improve tools for quick and reliable assessment of olfactory function.&nbsp;Odor-dispensing pens, called Sniffin&rsquo; Sticks, are an established method to deliver olfactory stimuli&nbsp;during diagnostic evaluation. We tested the suitability of a Bayesian adaptive algorithm (QUEST) to&nbsp;estimate olfactory sensitivity using Sniffin&rsquo; Sticks by comparing QUEST sensitivity thresholds with&nbsp;those obtained using a procedure based on an established standard staircase protocol. Thresholds&nbsp;were measured twice with both procedures in two sessions (Test and Retest). Overall, both procedures&nbsp;exhibited considerable overlap with QUEST displaying slightly higher test-retest correlations, less&nbsp;variability between measurements, and reduced testing duration. Notably, participants were more&nbsp;frequently presented with the highest concentration during the QUEST which may foster adaptation&nbsp; and habituation effects. We conclude that further research is required to better understand and&nbsp;optimize the procedure for&nbsp;assessment of olfactory performance.</p></subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="n">doi</subfield> <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield> <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2548620</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2840358</subfield> <subfield code="2">doi</subfield> </datafield> <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <subfield code="a">publication</subfield> <subfield code="b">preprint</subfield> </datafield> </record>
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 244 | 106 |
Downloads | 250 | 94 |
Data volume | 474.9 MB | 208.9 MB |
Unique views | 224 | 98 |
Unique downloads | 200 | 74 |