Journal article Open Access

Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor

Nader Ale Ebrahim نادر آل ابراهیم; Hadi Farhadi; Nader Ale Ebrahim نادر آل ابراهیم

Citation Style Language JSON Export

  "publisher": "Zenodo", 
  "DOI": "10.5281/zenodo.268126", 
  "author": [
      "family": "Nader Ale Ebrahim \u0646\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0622\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u06cc\u0645"
      "family": "Hadi Farhadi"
      "family": "Nader Ale Ebrahim \u0646\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0622\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u06cc\u0645"
  "issued": {
    "date-parts": [
  "abstract": "Journal impact factor (IF) as a gauge of influence and impact of a particular journal comparing with other journals in the same area of research, reports the mean number of citations to the published articles in particular journal. Although, IF attracts more attention and being used more frequently than other measures, it has been subjected to criticisms, which overcome the advantages of IF. Critically, extensive use of IF may result in destroying editorial and researchers' behaviour, which could compromise the quality of scientific articles. Therefore, it is the time of the timeliness and importance of a new invention of journal ranking techniques beyond the journal impact factor.", 
  "title": "Does Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor", 
  "type": "article-journal", 
  "id": "268126"
All versions This version
Views 101101
Downloads 3332
Data volume 4.9 MB4.8 MB
Unique views 9292
Unique downloads 3332


Cite as