Conference paper Open Access
Styliani Kleanthous; Elena Matsi
Mixed reality (MR) provides exciting interaction approaches in several applications. The user experience of interacting in these visually rich environments depends highly on the way the user perceives, processes, and comprehends visual information. In this work we are investigating the differences between Field Dependent – Field Independent users towards their interaction behavior in a MR environment when they were asked to perform a specific task. A study was conducted using Microsoft HoloLens device in which participants interacted with a popular HoloLens application, modified by the authors to log user interaction data in real time. Analysis of the results demonstrates the differences in the visual processing of information, especially in visually complex environments and the impact on the user's interaction behavior.
Billinghurst, Mark, Adrian Clark, and Gun Lee. "A survey of augmented reality." Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 8, no. 2-3 (2015): 73-272.
Charoula, Angeli, Nicos, Valanides, and Paul, Kirschner. Field dependence independence and instructional-design effects on learners' performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior 25,6 (2009) 1355– 1366.
Chih-Ming, Chen and Yen-Nung Tsai. Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education 59, 2 (2012), 638-652.
Christina, Katsini, Christos Fidas, Marios Belk, Nikolaos Avouris, and George Samaras. Influences of users' cognitive strategies on graphical password composition. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts, ACM, (2017), 2698-2705.
Drascic, David, and Paul Milgram. "Perceptual issues in augmented reality." In Stereoscopic displays and virtual reality systems III, vol. 2653, pp. 123-135. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1996.
Efi. Nisiforou, and Andrew Laghos. Field Dependence–Independence and Eye Movement Patterns: Investigating Users' Differences Through an Eye Tracking Study. Interacting with Computers 28, 4 (2016), 407-420.
George, Raptis, E., Christos Fidas, and Nikolaos Avouris. Effects of Mixed-Reality on Players' Behaviour and Immersion in a Cultural Tourism Game: A Cognitive Processing Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.003
Herman, Witkin, A., Carol Ann Moore, Donald, Goodenough, R., Patricia Cox, W. Field Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and their Educational Implications. ETS Research Bulletin Series 2, (1975), 1–64.
Herman, Witkin, A., Donald, Goodenough, R., Stephen, Karp, A. Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood. Journal of personality and social psychology 7, 3, (1967) 291–300.
Iulian, Radu. Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 6 (2014), 1533-1543.
Markus Löchtefeld, Frederik Wiehr, and Sven Gehring. 2017. Analysing the effect of tangibile user interfaces on spatial memory. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 78-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3131277.3132172
Philip, Oltman, K., Evelyn, Raskin, Herman, Witkin, A. Group Embedded Figures Test. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto CA, USA (1971).
Ronald, Azuma, T. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 6. 4 (1997): 355-385.