Book section Open Access

Alternating sounds and the formal franchise in phonology

James McElvenny

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.2654351</identifier>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>James McElvenny</creatorName>
<affiliation>University of Edinburgh</affiliation>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Alternating sounds and the formal franchise in phonology</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
<publicationYear>2019</publicationYear>
<dates>
<date dateType="Issued">2019-04-30</date>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="BookChapter"/>
<alternateIdentifiers>
<alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/2654351</alternateIdentifier>
</alternateIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifiers>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.2654350</relatedIdentifier>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/langscipress</relatedIdentifier>
</relatedIdentifiers>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
</rightsList>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;A matter of some controversy in the intersecting worlds of late nineteenth-century&lt;br&gt;
linguistics and anthropology was the nature of &amp;ldquo;alternating sounds&amp;rdquo;. This phe-&lt;br&gt;
nomenon is the apparent tendency, long assumed to be characteristic of &amp;ldquo;primitive&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;
languages, to freely vary the pronunciation of words, without any discernible sys-&lt;br&gt;
tem. Franz Boas (1858&amp;ndash;1942), rebutting received opinion in the American anthro-&lt;br&gt;
pological establishment, denied the existence of this phenomenon, arguing that it&lt;br&gt;
was an artefact of observation. Georg von der Gabelentz (1840&amp;ndash;1893), on the other&lt;br&gt;
hand, embraced the phenomenon and fashioned it into a critique of the compara-&lt;br&gt;
tive method as it was practised in Germany.&lt;br&gt;
Both Boas and Gabelentz &amp;ndash; and indeed also their opponents &amp;ndash; were well versed&lt;br&gt;
in the Humboldtian tradition of language scholarship, in particular as developed&lt;br&gt;
and transmitted by H. Steinthal (1823&amp;ndash;1899). Although the late nineteenth-century&lt;br&gt;
debates surrounding alternating sounds were informed by a number of sources,&lt;br&gt;
this chapter argues that Steinthal&amp;rsquo;s writings served as a key point of reference and&lt;br&gt;
offered several motifs that were taken up by his scholarly successors. In addition,&lt;br&gt;
and most crucially, the chapter demonstrates that the positions at which the partic-&lt;br&gt;
ipants in these debates arrived were determined not so much by any simple tech-&lt;br&gt;
nical disagreements but by underlying philosophical differences and sociological&lt;br&gt;
factors. This episode in the joint history of linguistics and anthropology is telling&lt;br&gt;
for what it reveals about the dominant mindset and temperament of these disci-&lt;br&gt;
plines in relation to the formal analysis of the world&amp;rsquo;s languages.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</descriptions>
</resource>

158
48
views