April 30, 2019 Book section Open Access

James McElvenny

DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.2654351</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>James McElvenny</creatorName>
      <affiliation>University of Edinburgh</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Alternating sounds and the formal franchise in phonology</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2019</publicationYear>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2019-04-30</date>
  </dates>
  <language>en</language>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="BookChapter"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/2654351</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsVersionOf">10.5281/zenodo.2654350</relatedIdentifier>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/langscipress</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;A matter of some controversy in the intersecting worlds of late nineteenth-century&lt;br&gt;
linguistics and anthropology was the nature of &amp;ldquo;alternating sounds&amp;rdquo;. This phe-&lt;br&gt;
nomenon is the apparent tendency, long assumed to be characteristic of &amp;ldquo;primitive&amp;rdquo;&lt;br&gt;
languages, to freely vary the pronunciation of words, without any discernible sys-&lt;br&gt;
tem. Franz Boas (1858&amp;ndash;1942), rebutting received opinion in the American anthro-&lt;br&gt;
pological establishment, denied the existence of this phenomenon, arguing that it&lt;br&gt;
was an artefact of observation. Georg von der Gabelentz (1840&amp;ndash;1893), on the other&lt;br&gt;
hand, embraced the phenomenon and fashioned it into a critique of the compara-&lt;br&gt;
tive method as it was practised in Germany.&lt;br&gt;
Both Boas and Gabelentz &amp;ndash; and indeed also their opponents &amp;ndash; were well versed&lt;br&gt;
in the Humboldtian tradition of language scholarship, in particular as developed&lt;br&gt;
and transmitted by H. Steinthal (1823&amp;ndash;1899). Although the late nineteenth-century&lt;br&gt;
debates surrounding alternating sounds were informed by a number of sources,&lt;br&gt;
this chapter argues that Steinthal&amp;rsquo;s writings served as a key point of reference and&lt;br&gt;
offered several motifs that were taken up by his scholarly successors. In addition,&lt;br&gt;
and most crucially, the chapter demonstrates that the positions at which the partic-&lt;br&gt;
ipants in these debates arrived were determined not so much by any simple tech-&lt;br&gt;
nical disagreements but by underlying philosophical differences and sociological&lt;br&gt;
factors. This episode in the joint history of linguistics and anthropology is telling&lt;br&gt;
for what it reveals about the dominant mindset and temperament of these disci-&lt;br&gt;
plines in relation to the formal analysis of the world&amp;rsquo;s languages.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>