2643360
doi
10.5281/zenodo.2643360
oai:zenodo.org:2643360
Kramer, Bianca
Utrecht University Library
Publication cultures and Dutch research output: a quantitative assessment
Bosman, Jeroen
Utrecht University Library
doi:10.5281/zenodo.2643367
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
publication culture
scholarly communication
research output
publication types
open access
Creative Commons
Unpaywall
Netherlands
VSNU
Utrecht University
CRIS
repositories
Digital Object Identifiers
metadata
<p>Report for The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU)</p>
<p>Data avalaible at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2643367">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2643367</a></p>
<p>Research into publication cultures commissioned by VSNU and carried out by Utrecht University Library has detailed university output beyond just journal articles, as well as the possibilities to assess open access levels of these other output types. For all four main fields reported on, the use of publication types other than journal articles is indeed substantial. For Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities in particular (with over 40% and over 60% of output respectively not being regular journal articles) looking at journal articles only ignores a significant share of their contribution to research and society. This is not only about books and book chapters, either: book reviews, conference papers, reports, case notes (in law) and all kinds of web publications are also significant parts of university output.</p>
<p>Analyzing all these publication forms and especially determining to what extent they are open access is currently not easy. Even combining some the largest citation databases (Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions) leaves out a lot of non-article content and in some fields even journal articles are only partly covered. Lacking metadata like affiliations and DOIs (either in the original documents or in the scholarly search engines) makes it even harder to analyze open access levels by institution and field. Using repository-harvesting databases like BASE and NARCIS in addition to the main citation databases improves understanding of open access of non-article output, but these routes also have limitations. The report has recommendations for stakeholders, mostly to improve metadata and coverage and apply persistent identifiers.</p>
Zenodo
2019-04-24
info:eu-repo/semantics/report
2643359
1579541973.432343
3364922
md5:90664c083e9679e9a563088b415a04be
https://zenodo.org/records/2643360/files/Publication_cultures_ a_quantitative_assessment.pdf
public
10.5281/zenodo.2643367
Is supplemented by
doi
10.5281/zenodo.2643359
isVersionOf
doi