Preprint Open Access

Altmetrics, alternative indicators for Web of Science Communication journals

Repiso, Rafael; Castillo-Esparcia, Antonio; Torres-Salinas, Daniel


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">American Psychological Asociation. (2017). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Boyd, D. M., &amp; Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, (13), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Casino, G. (2018). Cita periodística: Impacto de las revistas y los artículos científicos en la prensa generalista. El Profesional de la Información, 27(3), 692–697. doi:10.3145/epi.2018.may.22</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Colledge, L. (2017). Snowball Metrics Recipe Book (3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Snowball Metrics Program Partners. http://www.snowballmetrics.com/wp-content/uploads/snowball-recipe-book_HR.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Delgado-López-Cózar, E., &amp; Martín-Martín, A. (2016). Thomson Reuters utiliza altmétricas: usage counts para los artículos indizados en la Web of Science. Anuario ThinkEPI, 10(0), 209–221. doi:10.3145/thinkepi.2016.43</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Diga, M., &amp; Kelleher, T. (2009). Social media use, perceptions of decision-making power, and public relations roles. Public Relations Review, 35(4), 440–442. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.07.003</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Eyrich, N., Padman, M. L., &amp; Sweetser, K. D. (2008). PR practitioners' use of social media tools and communication technology. Public Relations Review, 34(4), 412–414. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of medical Internet Research, 13(4). doi:10.2196/jmir.2041</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Galligan, F., &amp; Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics : Rethinking the Way We Measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Gumpenberger, C., Glänzel, W., &amp; Gorraiz, J. (2016). The ecstasy and the agony of the altmetric score. Scientometrics, 108(2), 977–982. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1991-5</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Tsou, A., Sugimoto, C. R., &amp; Larivière, V. (2016). Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated "bot" accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(1), 232–238. doi:10.1002/asi.23456</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Langston, M., &amp; Tyler, J. (2004). Linking to journal articles in an online teaching environment: The persistent link, DOI, and OpenURL. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 51–58. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.004</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Lauf, E. (2005). National Diversity of Major International Journals in the Field of Communication. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 139–151. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02663.x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Leiner, D. J., &amp; Quiring, O. (2008). What interactivity means to the user essential insights into and a scale for perceived interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 127–155. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01434.x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Liu, J., &amp; Adie, E. (2013). New perspectives on article-level metrics: developing ways to assess research uptake and impact online. Insights: the UKSG journal, 26(2), 153–158. doi:10.1629/2048-7754.79</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Melero, R. (2015). Altmetrics – A complement to conventional metrics. Biochemia Medica, 25(2), 152–160. doi:10.11613/BM.2015.016</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Mey, M. de. (1992). The cognitive paradigm: An integrated Understanding of Scientific Development. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Moed, H. F. (2015). Altmetrics as traces of the computerization of the research process. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.05131</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Mohammadi, E., &amp; Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627–1638. doi:10.1002/asi.23071</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Park, H. W., &amp; Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals. Scientometrics, 81(1), 157–175. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2119-y</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., &amp; Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: a manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Repiso, R. (2015). Cómo identificar una revista de calidad. Cardiocore, (2), 46–48.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Repiso, R., &amp; Chaparro-Domínguez, M.-Á. (2018). Universidades españolas en la prensa extranjera. Análisis de su cobertura periodística. El Profesional de la Información, 27(1), 86–94. doi:10.3145/epi.2018.ene.08</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Robinson García, N., Torres-Salinas, D., Zahedi, Z., &amp; Costas, R. (2014). Nuevos datos, nuevas posibilidades: revelando el interior de Altmetric.com. El profesional de la información, 23(4), 359–366. doi:10.3145/epi.2014.jul.03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Segado-Boj, F. (2013). ¿ Revistas 2.0? Revistas científicas españolas del área de Comunicación en las redes sociales. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 19(abril), 1007–1016. doi:10.5209/rev_ESMP.2013.v19.42185</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Simmie, D., Vigliotti, M. G., &amp; Hankin, C. (2014). Ranking twitter influence by combining network centrality and influence observables in an evolutionary model. Journal of Complex Networks, 2(4), 495–517. doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., &amp; Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services. PLoS ONE, 8(5), 1–7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Torres-Salinas, D., Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., &amp; Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2013). Altmetrics : nuevos indicadores para la comunicación científica en la Web 2 . 0. Comunicar, 21(41), 53–60.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Velho, L. (1986). The "meaning" of citation in the context of a scientifically peripheral country. Scientometrics, 9(1–2), 71–89. doi:10.1007/BF02016609</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., &amp; Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102–106. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Williams, S. A., Terras, M., &amp; Warwick, C. (2013). What people study when they study Twitter. Journal of Documentation, 69(3), 528–554. doi:10.1108/JD-03-2012-0027</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Wouters, P., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., &amp; Rushforth, A. (2015). The Metric Tide: Literature Review (Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management). doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.5066.3520</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Yu, H., Xu, S., Xiao, T., Hemminger, B. M., &amp; Yang, S. (2017). Global science discussed in local altmetrics: Weibo and its comparison with Twitter. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 466–482. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.011</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., &amp; Wouters, P. (2014a). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1491–1513. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., &amp; Wouters, P. (2014b). Assessing the Impact of Publications Saved by Mendeley Users: Is There Any Different Pattern Among Users? In Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences (pp. 1–13). doi:10.13140/2.1.1528.1280</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1="C" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="x">Zhang, Y., &amp; Leung, L. (2015). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media &amp; Society, 17(7), 1007–1024. doi:10.1177/1461444813520477</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Altmetrics</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Journals</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Communication</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mendeley</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20190410032701.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">2591046</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Málaga</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9751-8628</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Castillo-Esparcia, Antonio</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Granada</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5648-250X</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Torres-Salinas, Daniel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">1271074</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:3b3c0984139f8749f41bf409db525ae5</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/2591046/files/englishpreprint.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-03-10</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:2591046</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="c">1-15</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Scientometrics</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Universidad Internacional de La Rioja</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-2803-7505</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Repiso, Rafael</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Altmetrics, alternative indicators for Web of Science Communication journals</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;The aim of this study is to analyse the occurrence of communication journals in the so-called Altmetrics (Facebook, Mendeley, Twitter, etc.) and how these indicators relate to each other and to the citations received. To this end, we study how the articles published by the Journal Citation Reports of the Web of Science for the 5-year period 2013&amp;ndash;2017 on the Altmetric.com platform are registered. The results show how only a few platforms have significant coverage for studying the whole and in the case of Mendeley and Twit-ter, the coverage is superior to the citations offered by Web of Science. There is a proven relationship between citations and their occurrence on social media and platforms and their intensity varies by product. In general, the journals with the highest number of citations (Journal of Computer Mediated, Journal of Communication or New Media &amp;amp; Society) with few exceptions (Continuum) stand out.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isPreviousVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.1007/s11192-019-03070</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2591045</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2591046</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">preprint</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
482
166
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 482483
Downloads 166166
Data volume 211.0 MB211.0 MB
Unique views 429430
Unique downloads 160160

Share

Cite as