Book section Open Access

Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change?

Martin Haspelmath

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="">
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120171846.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">2583804</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">198214</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:03150b66eb30bdf0effe0179d2b0965a</subfield>
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-03-05</subfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-langscipress</subfield>
    <subfield code="o"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">MPI-SHH Jena &amp; Leipzig University</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Martin Haspelmath</subfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Can cross-linguistic regularities be explained by constraints on change?</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-langscipress</subfield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;This paper addresses a recent trend in the study of language variation and universals, namely to attribute cross-linguistic patterns to diachrony, rather than to other causal factors. This is an interesting suggestion, and I try to make the basic concepts clearer, by distinguishing clearly between language-particular regularities, universal tendencies, and mere recurrent patterns, as well as three kinds of causal factors (preferences, constraints, restrictions). I make four claims: (i) Explanations may involve diachrony in different ways; (ii) for causal explanations of universal tendencies, one needs to invoke mutational constraints (change constraints); (iii) in addition to mutational constraints, we need functional-adaptive constraints as well, as is clear from cases of multi-convergence; and (iv) successful functional-adaptive explanations do not depend on understanding the precise pathways of change.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2583803</subfield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">1-23</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Language Science Press</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">978-3-96110-147-4</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Explanation in typology</subfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2583804</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">section</subfield>
All versions This version
Views 210208
Downloads 122122
Data volume 24.2 MB24.2 MB
Unique views 192190
Unique downloads 109109


Cite as