January 16, 2019 Other Open Access

Schulz, Thorsten; Hohenegger, Andreas; Ortega, Alvaro; Blasum, Holger

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Common Criteria</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Protection Profile</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CCUF</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Separation Kernel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20191216070904.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">2541464</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">ATSEC Information Security GmbH</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Hohenegger, Andreas</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">Epoche &amp; Espri</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Ortega, Alvaro</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">SYSGO AG</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Blasum, Holger</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">1131753</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:fb38e56590f24346b94b0f67209b85d8</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/2541464/files/White-Paper-MILS-Community-Feedback-on-the-Separation-Kernel-Protection-Profile-Draft.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2019-01-16</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">user-certmils</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-mils</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:2541464</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">University of Rostock</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Schulz, Thorsten</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Community Feedback on the Separation Kernel Protection Profile Draft</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-certmils</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-mils</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">731456</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Compositional security certification for medium- to high-assurance COTS-based systems in environments with emerging threats</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;This white paper is reporting on interoperability aspects of the Common Criteria Base Separation&amp;nbsp;Kernel Protection Profile (PP) draft. This&amp;nbsp;paper captures the results of the collaboration on&amp;nbsp;PP interoperability organised by University of Rostock in Task 9.2. It reports how the PP draft can&amp;nbsp;be applied to the separation kernels of MILS platform providers and how well the PP draft addresses&amp;nbsp;requirements of users such as system integrators. Previously, the WP 2 has created a PP with&amp;nbsp;additional modules. To make the proposed PP most accessible to all potential stakeholders in&amp;nbsp;the MILS domain and the Separation Kernel application domain, WP 9 proposed to gather feedback&amp;nbsp;from the community for integration into the PP draft.&lt;br&gt;
The activities being discussed resemble mostly the Common Criteria User Forum presentations and&amp;nbsp;its community involvement. Beyond that, certification bodies and a few known consortium contacts&amp;nbsp;were directly contacted and invited to provide feedback. The questions asked, as well as the&amp;nbsp;accumulated answers are presented.&lt;br&gt;
The white paper closes with a discussion on the continued improvement of the PP for proposed&amp;nbsp;acceptance and adoption.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2541463</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.2541464</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">other</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>