April 29, 2016 Journal article Open Access

Giorgi, Alberta

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Catholic bio-politics</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Feminism</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120132950.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">218254</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">329875</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:f0c198229b7b3c523d43e5a47fa6408e</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/218254/files/Giorgi_Estudos de Religião_2016.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2016-04-29</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">user-ecfunded</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:218254</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">FCT post-doc at the Centre for Social Studies (Coimbra); researcher for GRASSROOTSMOBILISE</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Giorgi, Alberta</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Winning in the Parliament, losing in the Courts – Catholic biopolitics in different venues: the case of Italy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">user-ecfunded</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="536" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">338463</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Examining Grassroots Mobilisations in Europe in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;The catholic bio-politics, in recent years, addressed a variety of issues. In this contribution&lt;br&gt;
I focus specifically on assisted reproduction and stem cell research in order to&lt;br&gt;
analyse the Catholic neo-feminist discourse, and the complex interplay of discursive&lt;br&gt;
arenas. Namely, I focus the attention on the reconfiguration of religious discourse&lt;br&gt;
in terms of attention to feminism and gender rights, on the one side, and discursive&lt;br&gt;
opportunity structures in terms of venues’ opportunities and constraints on the other.&lt;br&gt;
The analysis underlined two main elements. First of all, in relation to the process of&lt;br&gt;
judicialization of politics, the analysis pointed out the different opportunities and constraints&lt;br&gt;
characterizing the different venues. Namely, judicialization of politics and venue&lt;br&gt;
shopping are not favourable the same way for all the actors. Second, a neo-conservative&lt;br&gt;
frame of revolutionary maternity gained large room in the Italian political sphere, and it&lt;br&gt;
is likely to gain even more resonance in light of the current debate on surrogacy, related&lt;br&gt;
to the never-ending discussion on the forms of regulation of same-sex couples in Italy.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.15603/2176-1078/er.v30n1p11-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>