Journal article Open Access
Giorgi, Alberta
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd"> <identifier identifierType="URL">https://zenodo.org/record/218254</identifier> <creators> <creator> <creatorName>Giorgi, Alberta</creatorName> <givenName>Alberta</givenName> <familyName>Giorgi</familyName> <affiliation>FCT post-doc at the Centre for Social Studies (Coimbra); researcher for GRASSROOTSMOBILISE</affiliation> </creator> </creators> <titles> <title>Winning in the Parliament, losing in the Courts – Catholic biopolitics in different venues: the case of Italy</title> </titles> <publisher>Zenodo</publisher> <publicationYear>2016</publicationYear> <subjects> <subject>Catholic bio-politics</subject> <subject>Feminism</subject> </subjects> <dates> <date dateType="Issued">2016-04-29</date> </dates> <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="JournalArticle"/> <alternateIdentifiers> <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/218254</alternateIdentifier> </alternateIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifiers> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="DOI" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">10.15603/2176-1078/er.v30n1p11-27</relatedIdentifier> <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/ecfunded</relatedIdentifier> </relatedIdentifiers> <rightsList> <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights> <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights> </rightsList> <descriptions> <description descriptionType="Abstract"><p>The catholic bio-politics, in recent years, addressed a variety of issues. In this contribution<br> I focus specifically on assisted reproduction and stem cell research in order to<br> analyse the Catholic neo-feminist discourse, and the complex interplay of discursive<br> arenas. Namely, I focus the attention on the reconfiguration of religious discourse<br> in terms of attention to feminism and gender rights, on the one side, and discursive<br> opportunity structures in terms of venues’ opportunities and constraints on the other.<br> The analysis underlined two main elements. First of all, in relation to the process of<br> judicialization of politics, the analysis pointed out the different opportunities and constraints<br> characterizing the different venues. Namely, judicialization of politics and venue<br> shopping are not favourable the same way for all the actors. Second, a neo-conservative<br> frame of revolutionary maternity gained large room in the Italian political sphere, and it<br> is likely to gain even more resonance in light of the current debate on surrogacy, related<br> to the never-ending discussion on the forms of regulation of same-sex couples in Italy.</p></description> </descriptions> <fundingReferences> <fundingReference> <funderName>European Commission</funderName> <funderIdentifier funderIdentifierType="Crossref Funder ID">10.13039/100011102</funderIdentifier> <awardNumber awardURI="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/338463/">338463</awardNumber> <awardTitle>Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Examining Grassroots Mobilisations in Europe in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence</awardTitle> </fundingReference> </fundingReferences> </resource>
Views | 36 |
Downloads | 97 |
Data volume | 32.0 MB |
Unique views | 35 |
Unique downloads | 96 |