April 29, 2016 Journal article Open Access

Giorgi, Alberta

DCAT Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:adms="http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dctype="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/" xmlns:dcat="http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#" xmlns:duv="http://www.w3.org/ns/duv#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:frapo="http://purl.org/cerif/frapo/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:gsp="http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#" xmlns:locn="http://www.w3.org/ns/locn#" xmlns:org="http://www.w3.org/ns/org#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:prov="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:vcard="http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#" xmlns:wdrs="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://zenodo.org/record/218254">
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://zenodo.org/record/218254</dct:identifier>
    <foaf:page rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/218254"/>
    <dct:creator>
      <rdf:Description>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent"/>
        <foaf:name>Giorgi, Alberta</foaf:name>
        <foaf:givenName>Alberta</foaf:givenName>
        <foaf:familyName>Giorgi</foaf:familyName>
        <org:memberOf>
          <foaf:Organization>
            <foaf:name>FCT post-doc at the Centre for Social Studies (Coimbra); researcher for GRASSROOTSMOBILISE</foaf:name>
          </foaf:Organization>
        </org:memberOf>
      </rdf:Description>
    </dct:creator>
    <dct:title>Winning in the Parliament, losing in the Courts – Catholic biopolitics in different venues: the case of Italy</dct:title>
    <dct:publisher>
      <foaf:Agent>
        <foaf:name>Zenodo</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Agent>
    </dct:publisher>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gYear">2016</dct:issued>
    <dcat:keyword>Catholic bio-politics</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Feminism</dcat:keyword>
    <frapo:isFundedBy rdf:resource="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/338463/"/>
    <schema:funder>
      <foaf:Organization>
        <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">10.13039/100011102</dct:identifier>
        <foaf:name>European Commission</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Organization>
    </schema:funder>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date">2016-04-29</dct:issued>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/218254"/>
    <adms:identifier>
      <adms:Identifier>
        <skos:notation rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">https://zenodo.org/record/218254</skos:notation>
        <adms:schemeAgency>url</adms:schemeAgency>
      </adms:Identifier>
    </adms:identifier>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.15603/2176-1078/er.v30n1p11-27"/>
    <dct:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/communities/ecfunded"/>
    <dct:description>&lt;p&gt;The catholic bio-politics, in recent years, addressed a variety of issues. In this contribution&lt;br&gt; I focus specifically on assisted reproduction and stem cell research in order to&lt;br&gt; analyse the Catholic neo-feminist discourse, and the complex interplay of discursive&lt;br&gt; arenas. Namely, I focus the attention on the reconfiguration of religious discourse&lt;br&gt; in terms of attention to feminism and gender rights, on the one side, and discursive&lt;br&gt; opportunity structures in terms of venues’ opportunities and constraints on the other.&lt;br&gt; The analysis underlined two main elements. First of all, in relation to the process of&lt;br&gt; judicialization of politics, the analysis pointed out the different opportunities and constraints&lt;br&gt; characterizing the different venues. Namely, judicialization of politics and venue&lt;br&gt; shopping are not favourable the same way for all the actors. Second, a neo-conservative&lt;br&gt; frame of revolutionary maternity gained large room in the Italian political sphere, and it&lt;br&gt; is likely to gain even more resonance in light of the current debate on surrogacy, related&lt;br&gt; to the never-ending discussion on the forms of regulation of same-sex couples in Italy.&lt;/p&gt;</dct:description>
    <dct:accessRights rdf:resource="http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/access-right/PUBLIC"/>
    <dct:accessRights>
      <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">
        <rdfs:label>Open Access</rdfs:label>
      </dct:RightsStatement>
    </dct:accessRights>
    <dct:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"/>
    <dcat:distribution>
      <dcat:Distribution>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource="https://doi.org/10.15603/2176-1078/er.v30n1p11-27"/>
        <dcat:byteSize>329875</dcat:byteSize>
        <dcat:downloadURL rdf:resource="https://zenodo.org/record/218254/files/Giorgi_Estudos de Religião_2016.pdf"/>
        <dcat:mediaType>application/pdf</dcat:mediaType>
      </dcat:Distribution>
    </dcat:distribution>
  </rdf:Description>
  <foaf:Project rdf:about="info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/338463/">
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">338463</dct:identifier>
    <dct:title>Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Examining Grassroots Mobilisations in Europe in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence</dct:title>
    <frapo:isAwardedBy>
      <foaf:Organization>
        <dct:identifier rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">10.13039/100011102</dct:identifier>
        <foaf:name>European Commission</foaf:name>
      </foaf:Organization>
    </frapo:isAwardedBy>
  </foaf:Project>
</rdf:RDF>