Published December 18, 2014
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Development of the third gender linguistic variation
Description
Member of the third gender develop linguistic patterns by adding or inverting letters from the original word. Linguistic patterns show inversion, addition, changing, omission and coinage. The study uses descriptive-interpretative design. Three areas are interpreted; coined words are ambivalent to become discreet in exchanging messages that might be offensive to conservative listeners.
Files
68-Article Text-116-1-10-20181206.pdf
Files
(2.2 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:2233d4f89504a5179367be56e4a506eb
|
2.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Johnson, J. L., & Repta, R. (2007). Sex and gender: Beyond the binaries. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Women's Health Research Network 17-37.
- Harris, K. D. (2005). Queer theory: Definition and literary example. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page on June 24, 2014.
- Howells, S. (1996). Wretched fetishes: Character, realism, and other modern instances. Texas Studies in Literature and Language. 38(1):26-50.
- McElhinny, B. (1998). Genealogies of gender theory: Practice theory and feminism in socio-cultural and linguistic anthropology. Social Analysis, 42(3), 164–89.
- McElhinny, B. (2014). Theorizing gender in Sociolinguistics and Linguistic Anthropology: The History and theoretical background to the study of language and Gender. In S. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff, J. Holmes & B. McElhinny (Eds.) Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality (pp. 22-42). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Nemati, A., & Bayer, J. M. (2010). Gender differences in language use: A short look at Lakoff's and Tannen's theories.
- Richter, D. (1998). Introduction to "Gender Studies and Queer Theory" in the Critical Tradition (2nd ed.). NY: Bedford/St. Martin's.
- Romaine, S. (1998). Variation in language and gender. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California.