Published May 19, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The current distribution of an invasive moss species Campylopus introflexus (Leucobryaceae) and models of its future range dynamics in two contrasting climatic scenarios in Europe

  • 1. Biotechnology Advanced Research Centre, Sheda Science and Technology Complex, P.M.B. 186, Garki., Abuja, Nigeria|Institute of Botany and Botanical garden "Jevremovac", Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 2. Institute of Botany and Botanical garden "Jevremovac", Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 3. Center of Plant Biotechnology and Conservation (CPBC), Takovska 43, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia|Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Mánesova 23, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia|Institute of Botany and Botanical garden "Jevremovac", Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia

Description

Campylopus introflexus is a suboceanic temperate moss species native to the Southern Hemisphere. It was unintentionally introduced to north-western Europe in the first half of the previous century and it has become invasive. The species continues to expand its European range, spreading eastwards, yet its potential distribution is still poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to identify suitable areas for the potential further spread of this neophytic invasive species across Europe and to assess the impact of climate change on its spread, in order to be considered in flora conservation, protection and management strategies for local bryophytes as well as other low-competitive plant species. We used various species distribution models in two climatic scenarios. These models predicted the current, potential and future ranges of C. introflexus in Europe. Based on these models, we identified the main environmental factors affecting its distribution and analysed the changes in suitable habitats under future climatic conditions. Temperature seasonality proved to be the most important environmental factor influencing the distribution of this species. In general, the results suggest that, under the influence of climate change and rising global temperatures, this species will decrease its range size, while the most suitable habitats are expected to shift towards higher latitudes and/or altitudes in the future. These findings support climate as the limiting factor in species expansion, providing a basis for targeted monitoring of the species and key areas in the future.

Files

BDJ_article_177294.pdf

Files (815.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ea610bf4a916df3fa6c4c207c5abac62
619.6 kB Preview Download
md5:505db010ce43e80b88eb214978581801
195.6 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Abay G, Gül S (2025) Modeling the distribution of the endemic Turkish moss species Cinclidotus bistratosus Kürschner & Lüb.-Nestle (Pottiaceae) under various climate change scenarios. Frontiers in Plant Science 16 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1659115
  • Abubakar I, Pantović J, Šinžar-Sekulić J, Sabovljević M (2024) Modeling the Distribution of the Rare and Red-Listed Halophytic Moss Species Entosthodon hungaricus Under Various Climate Change Scenarios in Serbia. Plants 13 (23). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233347
  • Alegro A, Šegota V, Papp B, Deme J, Kovács D, Purger D, Csiky J (2018) The invasive moss Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. (Bryophyta) spreads further into South-Eastern Europe. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 39 (3): 331‑341. https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb/v39.iss3.2018.331
  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology 43 (6): 1223‑1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
  • Barkman J, Mabelis A (1968) Notes on the taxonomy, geography, and ecology of the piliferous Campylopus species in the Netherlands and NW Germany. Collectanea Botanica 7: 69‑90.
  • Bellard C, Marino C, Courchamp F (2022) Ranking threats to biodiversity and why it doesn't matter. Nature Communications 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30339-y
  • Berg C (1985) Zur Ökologie der neophytischen Laubmoosart Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. In Mecklenburg. Arch. Freunde. Naturgesch. Meckl. 25: 117‑126.
  • Biermann R, Daniels FA (1997) Changes in a lichen-rich dry sand grassland vegetation with special reference to lichen synusiae and Campylopus introflexus. Phytocoenologia 27 (2): 257‑273. https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/27/1997/257
  • Blockeel T, Bosanquet S, Hill M, Preston C (2014) Atlas of British & Irish Bryophytes, Volume 2. Mosses. Pisces Publications, 652 pp.
  • Boria R, Olson L, Goodman S, Anderson R (2014) Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecological Modelling 275: 73‑77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012
  • Bourgeois B, Hugron S, Poulin M (2012) Establishing a moss cover inhibits the germination of Typha latifolia, an invasive species, in restored peatlands. Aquatic Botany 100: 76‑79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.03.010
  • Brennan R, Withgott H (2005) Essential environment: The science behind the stories. Benjamin-Cummings, San Francisco, 432 pp. [ISBN 080534487X, 9780805344875]
  • Chen X, Yang J, Feng L, Zhou T, Zhang H, Li H, Bai G, Meng X, Li Z, Zhao G (2020) Phylogeography and population dynamics of an endemic oak (Quercus fabri Hance) in subtropical China revealed by molecular data and ecological niche modeling. Tree Genetics & Genomes 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-019-1383-0
  • Cordier J, Loyola R, Rojas-Soto O, Nori J (2020) Modeling invasive species risk from established populations: Insights for management and conservation. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 18 (2): 132‑138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2020.06.001
  • Csiky J, Erzberger P, Kovács D, Deme J (2015) Campylopus flexuosus (Hedw.) Brid. a Nyugat-Mecsekben. Kitaibelia 20 (1): 28‑37. https://doi.org/10.17542/kit.20.28
  • Désamoré A, Laenen B, Stech M, Papp B, Hedenäs L, Mateo R, Vanderpoorten A (2012) How do temperate bryophytes face the challenge of a changing environment? Lessons from the past and predictions for the future. Global Change Biology 18 (9): 2915‑2924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02752.x
  • Dierßen K (2001) Distribution, ecological amplitude and phytosociological characterization of European bryophytes. Bryophytorum Biblioteca 56, 289 pp. [ISBN 978-3-443-62028-8]
  • Dormann C, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão P, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne P, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore A, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2012) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36 (1): 27‑46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
  • Dukes J (2000) Will the increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration affect the success of invasive species. In: Mooney H, Hobbs R (Eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, 457 pp. [ISBN 1-55963-781-1].
  • Dyderski M, Paź S, Frelich L, Jagodziński A (2017) How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions? Global Change Biology 24 (3): 1150‑1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13925
  • Ellis LT, Aleffi M, Tacchi R, Alegro A, Alonso M, Asthana AK, Sahu V, Biasuso AB, Callaghan DA, Ezer T, Kara R, Seyli T, Garilleti R, Gil-López MJ, Gwynne-Evans D, Hedderson TA, Kiebacher T, Larrain J, Long D, Lüth M, Malcolm B, Mamontov YS, Newsham KK, Nobis M, Nowak A, Ochyra R, Pawlikowski P, Plášek V, Čihal L, Potemkin AD, Puche F, Rios D, Gallego MT, Guerra J, Sawicki J, Schäfer-Verwimp A, Segarra-Moragues JG, Šegota V, Sofronova EV, Ştefănuţ S, Szűcs P, Bidló A, Papp B, Szurdoki E, Tan BC, Váňa J, Vigalondo B, Draper I, Lara F, Yoon Y-, Sun B-, Nishimura N (2014) New national and regional bryophyte records, 41. Journal of Bryology 36 (4): 306‑324. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743282014y.0000000123
  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animal and plants. London, Methuen. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7214-9
  • Equihua M, Usher M (1993) Impact of carpets of the invasive moss Campylopus Introflexus on Calluna vulgaris regeneration. The Journal of Ecology 81 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2261506
  • Essl F, Lambdon P (2009) Alien bryophytes and lichens of Europe. Handbook of Alien Species in Europe29‑41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8280-1_3
  • Essl F, Steinbauer K, Dullinger S, Mang T, Moser D (2013) Little, but increasing evidence of impacts by alien bryophytes. Biological Invasions 16 (5): 1175‑1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0572-2
  • Essl F, Dullinger S, Moser D, Steinbauer K, Mang T (2014) Macroecology of global bryophyte invasions at different invasion stages. Ecography 38 (5): 488‑498. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00905
  • Fick S, Hijmans R (2017) WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37 (12): 4302‑4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086
  • Gallien L, Münkemüller T, Albert C, Boulangeat I, Thuiller W (2010) Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here? Diversity and Distributions 16 (3): 331‑342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00652.x
  • GBIF.org (2025) GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.ky4m4y. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.ky4m4y. Accessed on: 2025-2-18.
  • Gignac LD (2001) Bryophytes as indicators of climate change. The Bryologist 104 (3): 410‑420. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2001)104[0410:baiocc]2.0.co;2
  • Glime J (2017) Adaptive strategies: Spore Dispersal Vectors. In: Glime J (Ed.) Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists URL: Last updated 6 January 2023 http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>.
  • Górski P, Smoczyk M, Rosadziński S, Staniaszek-Kik M, Klama H, Pawlikowski P, Wilhelm M, Topolska K, Romański M (2016) New distributional data on Bryophytes of Poland and Slovakia, 7. Steciana 20 (3): 117‑127. https://doi.org/10.12657/steciana.020.014
  • Guisan A, Zimmermann N (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135: 147‑186. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00354-9
  • Hassel K, Söderström L (2005) The expansion of the alien mosses Orthodontium lineare and Campylopus introflexus in Britain and continental Europe. The Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 97: 183‑193. https://doi.org/10.18968/jhbl.97.0_183
  • Hasse T (2022) CABI - Invasive Species Compendium (2009) Campylopus introflexus. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.108875. Accessed on: 2025-8-06.
  • Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2009) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. Journal of Ecology 97 (3): 393‑403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x
  • He X, He K, Hyvönen J (2016) Will bryophytes survive in a warming world? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 19: 49‑60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2016.02.005
  • Hodgetts N, Lockhart N (2020) Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – update 2020. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 123. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland, 214 pp.
  • Huang Y, Li T, Chen W, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Guo T, Wang S, Liu J, Qin Y (2024) Analysis of the Distribution Pattern of Phenacoccus manihoti in China under Climate Change Based on the Biomod2 Model. Biology 13 (7). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070538
  • Jacques E, Lambinon J (1968) Campylopus polytrichoides De Not. et C. introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. en Belgique. Bulletin du Jardin botanique national de Belgique/Bulletin van de National Plantentuin van België 38 (2): 147‑153. https://doi.org/10.2307/3667548
  • Jiménez‐Valverde A (2011) Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21 (4): 498‑507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00683.x
  • Klinck J (2010) NOBANIS – Invasive alien species fact sheet – Campylopus introflexus. From: Online database of the European network on invasive alien species - NOBANIS. www.nobanis.org. Accessed on: 2025-2-26.
  • Kriebitzsch WU, Ewald J (2011) Waldartenlisten der Farn-und Blütenpflanzen, Moose und Flechten Deutschlands (Vol. 299). M. Schmidt (Ed.). Bonn, Germany: BfN. [In German].
  • Kulhanek S, Leung B, Ricciardi A (2011) Using ecological niche models to predict the abundance and impact of invasive species: application to the common carp. Ecological Applications 21 (1): 203‑213. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1639.1
  • Lisowski S, Urbanski P (1989) Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid.-nowy gatunek dla brioflory Polski. Badania fizjograficzne nad Polska zachodnia 39: 181‑183.
  • Liu Y, Oduor AO, Zhang Z, Manea A, Tooth I, Leishman M, Xu X, van Kleunen M (2017) Do invasive alien plants benefit more from global environmental change than native plants? Global Change Biology 23 (8): 3363‑3370. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13579
  • Mateo R, Broennimann O, Petitpierre B, Muñoz J, van Rooy J, Laenen B, Guisan A, Vanderpoorten A (2014) What is the potential of spread in invasive bryophytes? Ecography 38 (5): 480‑487. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01014
  • Mauritsen T, Bader J, Becker T, Behrens J, Bittner M, Brokopf R, Brovkin V, Claussen M, Crueger T, Esch M, Fast I, Fiedler S, Fläschner D, Gayler V, Giorgetta M, Goll D, Haak H, Hagemann S, Hedemann C, Hohenegger C, Ilyina T, Jahns T, Jimenéz‐de‐la‐Cuesta D, Jungclaus J, Kleinen T, Kloster S, Kracher D, Kinne S, Kleberg D, Lasslop G, Kornblueh L, Marotzke J, Matei D, Meraner K, Mikolajewicz U, Modali K, Möbis B, Müller W, Nabel JMS, Nam CW, Notz D, Nyawira S, Paulsen H, Peters K, Pincus R, Pohlmann H, Pongratz J, Popp M, Raddatz TJ, Rast S, Redler R, Reick C, Rohrschneider T, Schemann V, Schmidt H, Schnur R, Schulzweida U, Six K, Stein L, Stemmler I, Stevens B, von Storch J, Tian F, Voigt A, Vrese P, Wieners K, Wilkenskjeld S, Winkler A, Roeckner E (2019) Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and its response to increasing CO2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 11 (4): 998‑1038. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ms001400
  • Meyerson L, Mooney H (2007) Invasive alien species in an era of globalization. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (4): 199‑208. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[199:iasiae]2.0.co;2
  • Mohajane M, Costache R, Karimi F, Bao Pham Q, Essahlaoui A, Nguyen H, Laneve G, Oudija F (2021) Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a Mediterranean area. Ecological Indicators 129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107869
  • Naimi B, Hamm NS, Groen T, Skidmore A, Toxopeus A (2014) Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling? Ecography 37 (2): 191‑203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x
  • Pantović J, Sabovljević M (2017) Overview Of Bryophyte Flora Research In Serbia With Presentation Of The Serbian Bryo Database. Botanica Serbica 41 (2): 153‑162. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1026372
  • Pantović J, Božović D, Sabovljević M (2023) Possible effects of climate change on the occurrence and distribution of the rare moss Buxbaumia viridis in Serbia (SE Europe). Plants 12 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030557
  • Pehle A, Schirmel J (2015) Moss invasion in a dune ecosystem influences ground-dwelling arthropod community structure and reduces soil biological activity. Biological Invasions 17 (12): 3467‑3477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0971-7
  • Priede A, Mežaka A (2016) Invasion of the alien moss Campylopus introflexus in cutaway peatlands. Herzogia 29 (1): 35‑51. https://doi.org/10.13158/heia.29.1.2016.35
  • Proctor MF, Oliver M, Wood A, Alpert P, Stark L, Cleavitt N, Mishler B (2007) Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes: a review. The Bryologist 110 (4): 595‑621. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2007)110[595:dibar]2.0.co;2
  • R Core Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.3) [Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria https://doi.org/10.32614/r.manuals
  • Reimers H (1956) Beiträge zur Mossflora von Italien. Willdenowia 1: 533‑562.
  • Richards P (1963) Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. and C. polytrichoides De Not. in the British Isles: a preliminary account. Transactions of the British bryological society 4: 404‑417. https://doi.org/10.1179/006813863804812390
  • Sabovljevic M, Tomovic G, Niketic M, Lazarevic P, Lazarevic M, Latinovic J, Latinovic N, Kabas E, Djurovic S, Kutnar L, Skudnik M, Pantovic J, Stevanoski I, Vukojicic S, Veljic M (2020) New records and noteworthy data of plants, algae and fungi in SE Europe and adjacent regions, 1. Botanica Serbica 44 (1): 81‑87. https://doi.org/10.2298/botserb2001081s
  • Sabovljevic M, Tomovic G, Taşkın H, Assyov B, Skondric S, Peric R, Sabovljevic A, Dragicevic S, Markovic A, Knezevic J, Lobnik C, Strgulc-Krajsek S, Djordjevic V, Krdzic S, Ilchev I, Stoykov D, Alvarado P, Djurovic S, Buzurovic U, Stankovic M, Kasom G, Papp B, Pantovic J, Ştefănuţ S, Ştefănuţ M, Trbojevic I, Romanov0 R, Schmidt D, Korda M (2023) New records and noteworthy data of plants, algae and fungi in SE Europe and adjacent regions, 15. Botanica Serbica 47 (2): 361‑374. https://doi.org/10.2298/botserb2302361s
  • Sabovljević M, Alegro A, Sabovljević A, Marka J, Vujičić M (2011) An insight into diversity of the Balkan Peninsula bryophyte flora in the European background. Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie) 66 (4): 399‑413. https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2011.1608
  • Schirmel J, Timler L, Buchholz S (2011) Impact of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) in acidic coastal dunes at the southern Baltic Sea. Biological Invasions 13 (3): 605‑620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9852-2
  • Schirmel J, Buchholz S (2013) Invasive moss alters patterns in life-history traits and functional diversity of spiders and carabids. Biological Invasions 15 (5): 1089‑1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0352-4
  • Šegota V, Alegro A, Samardžić M, Rebrina F, Brigić A (2021) Invasive moss Campylopus introflexus (HEDW.) BRID. continues to spread through Croatia. In: Jelaska S (Ed.) Book of abstracts. 4th Croatian symposium on invasive species with international participation, Zagreb, 2021. Hrvatsko ekološko društvo, 36 pp.
  • Sparrius L, Kooijman A (2011) Invasiveness of Campylopus introflexus in drift sands depends on nitrogen deposition and soil organic matter. Applied Vegetation Science 14 (2): 221‑229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109x.2010.01120.x
  • Srivastava V, Lafond V, Griess VC (2019) Species distribution models (SDM): applications, benefits and challenges in invasive species management. CABI Reviews1‑13. https://doi.org/10.1079/pavsnnr201914020
  • SSC (2000) IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. In Species Survival Commission. The 51st Meeting of the IUCN Council. Gland Switzerland.. URL: http://www. issg.org/pdf/guidelines_iucn.pdf.
  • Størmer P (1958) Some mosses from the phytogeographical excursion 1–9 through the Armorican massive in 1954. Revue bryologique et lichénologique 27: 13‑16.
  • Strgulc Krajšek S, Trnkoczy A, Cimerman Ž, Dakskobler I (2023) Alien moss species Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. in Slovenia. Hladnikia 52: 29‑45. URL: https://botanicno-drustvo.si/files/2023/12/HLADNIKIA-52_2023-2-NET.pdf
  • Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo M (2009) BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32 (3): 369‑373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05742.x
  • Townsend Peterson A, Papeş M, Eaton M (2007) Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30 (4): 550‑560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05102.x
  • Van der Meulen F, van der Hagen H, Kruijsen B (1987) Campylopus introflexus: invasion of a moss in Dutch coastal dunes. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Serie C 90: 73‑80.
  • Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters 14 (7): 702‑708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
  • Vitousek P, Mooney H, Lubchenco J, Melillo J (1997) Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277 (5325): 494‑499. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494
  • Wittenberg R, Cock M (2001) Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. Publication of GISP, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK., 238 pp. [ISBN 0-85199-569-1]
  • Zanatta F, Engler R, Collart F, Broennimann O, Mateo RG, Papp B, Muñoz J, Baurain D, Guisan A, Vanderpoorten A (2020) Bryophytes are predicted to lag behind future climate change despite their high dispersal capacities. Nature Communications 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19410-8
  • Żarnowiec J, Stebel A, Chmura D (2019) Thirty-year invasion of the alien moss Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. in Poland (East-Central Europe). Biological Invasions 21 (1): 7‑18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1818-9
  • Zhang Y, Ma W, Zhou Q, Cao W, Qu B, Guo J, Zhou L, Deng J, Zhang Y, Li Y, Dai L (2026) Analysis of the Potential Distribution of Solanum rostratum in China Based on the Biomod2 Ensemble Model. Plants 15 (5). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050816
  • Zizka A, Silvestro D, Andermann T, Azevedo J, Duarte Ritter C, Edler D, Farooq H, Herdean A, Ariza M, Scharn R, Svantesson S, Wengström N, Zizka V, Antonelli A (2019) CoordinateCleaner: Standardized cleaning of occurrence records from biological collection databases. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10 (5): 744‑751. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13152
  • Zuur A, Ieno E, Elphick C (2009) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1 (1): 3‑14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2009.00001.x