Conference paper Open Access

Why Is Relevance Still the Basic Notion in Information Science? (Despite Great Advances in Information Technology)

Saračević, Tefko


DataCite XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.1/metadata.xsd">
  <identifier identifierType="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17964</identifier>
  <creators>
    <creator>
      <creatorName>Saračević, Tefko</creatorName>
      <givenName>Tefko</givenName>
      <familyName>Saračević</familyName>
      <affiliation>School of Communication and Information, Rutgers University</affiliation>
    </creator>
  </creators>
  <titles>
    <title>Why Is Relevance Still the Basic Notion in Information Science? (Despite Great Advances in Information Technology)</title>
  </titles>
  <publisher>Zenodo</publisher>
  <publicationYear>2015</publicationYear>
  <subjects>
    <subject>Relevance</subject>
    <subject>Information science</subject>
    <subject>Information retrieval</subject>
    <subject>Searching</subject>
  </subjects>
  <dates>
    <date dateType="Issued">2015-05-26</date>
  </dates>
  <resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="ConferencePaper"/>
  <alternateIdentifiers>
    <alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="url">https://zenodo.org/record/17964</alternateIdentifier>
  </alternateIdentifiers>
  <relatedIdentifiers>
    <relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsPartOf">https://zenodo.org/communities/isi2015</relatedIdentifier>
  </relatedIdentifiers>
  <rightsList>
    <rights rightsURI="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rights>
    <rights rightsURI="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">Open Access</rights>
  </rightsList>
  <descriptions>
    <description descriptionType="Abstract">&lt;p&gt;Relevance is a fundamental notion in information science. The aim of this&lt;br /&gt;
paper is to provide a perspective on two large questions, the first historical&lt;br /&gt;
the second contemporary: (1) Why did relevance become a central notion of&lt;br /&gt;
information science? (2) In this day and age of huge advances in information&lt;br /&gt;
technology, why did relevance still remain a central notion? In the 1950s,&lt;br /&gt;
relevance emerged as a central notion in information science because of extensive&lt;br /&gt;
theoretical and practical concerns with and commitments to searching&lt;br /&gt;
and not only with organization of information. In turn, searching was connected&lt;br /&gt;
to and made possible by many innovations in computers and computing.&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary advances in information technology brought about great&lt;br /&gt;
many changes. Search engines, social media, and a myriad of new information&lt;br /&gt;
resources emerged and transformed the world. Searching for information&amp;nbsp;is used widely all over the globe by all kinds of populations and reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
However, searching is still based on relevance. Relevance was and still is a&lt;br /&gt;
fundamental notion related to searching and retrieval of information. Conclusions&lt;br /&gt;
emphasize that information technology and myriad applications are&lt;br /&gt;
changing at an accelerated pace. However, no matter what, relevance is here&lt;br /&gt;
to stay. Relevance is timeless. Concerns about relevance will always be&lt;br /&gt;
timely.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </descriptions>
</resource>
64
309
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 6464
Downloads 309309
Data volume 38.0 MB38.0 MB
Unique views 6161
Unique downloads 296296

Share

Cite as