Conference paper Open Access

How Do Participants Deal with Questions if Asked to Rate Visual Dimensions of an Object?

Kattenbeck, M

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="">
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2015-05-26</subfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120170023.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">17941</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="711" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="d">19th–21st May 2015</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">ISI 2015</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Re:inventing Information Science in the Networked Society. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science</subfield>
    <subfield code="c"> Zadar, Croatia</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">Session 4: Information Behaviour and User Studies</subfield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;Research Question: How do participants behave when asked to rate objects&amp;rsquo;&lt;br /&gt;
visual dimensions?&lt;br /&gt;
Approach: Qualitative Data Analysis&lt;br /&gt;
Method: 90 participants were asked to rate 11 objects located along a route of&lt;br /&gt;
1.1 km length and asked to explain their rating behaviour using a think-aloud&lt;br /&gt;
protocol.&lt;br /&gt;
Results: If asked to rate several objects, participants tend to stop reading the&lt;br /&gt;
questions as a whole. Moreover, when judging objects on visual dimensions&lt;br /&gt;
they make inconsistent use of local neighbourhoods.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">143305</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:32dfbcca424b8d883488661f764466a1</subfield>
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">conferencepaper</subfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kattenbeck, M</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pedestrian navigation</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Collaborative landmark mining</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Visual dimensions</subfield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Salience survey</subfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.17941</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">How Do Participants Deal with Questions if Asked to Rate Visual Dimensions of an Object?</subfield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2"></subfield>
All versions This version
Views 1111
Downloads 7878
Data volume 11.2 MB11.2 MB
Unique views 1111
Unique downloads 7878


Cite as