Marsden, Chris
2016-09-30
<p>The final comparative report D1.3.d2 makes a series of suggested reforms to systems based on country case studies. For this purpose, the key functionalities of the existing legal publishing system are summarized and described. This activity involved a review of the existing information systems and legal databases already in use and will produce a specification of the requirements of the system on the basis of the analysis of social, legal and market requirements. The case studies represent the key socio-economic and legal aspects of the services and illustrate the main functionalities, structure and operation of the proposed services. The findings have been informed by key informant interviews and form a working assumption. The interviews were supported by the literature review and the insights of workshops. ...</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.158983
oai:zenodo.org:158983
Zenodo
https://zenodo.org/communities/openlaws-eu
https://doi.org/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
openlaws.eu: Comparative country report: White paper on the openlaws.eu open innovation community
info:eu-repo/semantics/report