Preprint Open Access

From coalition to commons: Plan S and the future of scholarly communication

Johnson, Rob

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="" xmlns:oai_dc="" xmlns:xsi="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <dc:creator>Johnson, Rob</dc:creator>
  <dc:description>The announcement of Plan S in September 2018 has triggered a wide-ranging debate over how best to accelerate the shift to open access. The Plan’s ten principles represent a call for the creation of an intellectual commons, to be brought into being through collective action by funders and managed through regulated market mechanisms. As it gathers both momentum and critics, the coalition must grapple with questions of equity, efficiency and sustainability. The work of Elinor Ostrom has shown that successful management of the commons frequently relies on polycentricity and adaptive governance. The Plan S principles must therefore function as an overarching framework within which local actors retain some autonomy, and should remain open to amendment as the scholarly communication landscape evolves.

This is a preprint of the following article, which was published by UKSG Insights on 30 January 2019:

Johnson, Rob. 2019. “From Coalition to Commons: Plan S and the Future of Scholarly Communication”. Insights 32 (1): 5. DOI:</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>open access</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>scholarly communications</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>plan S</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>research policy</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>From coalition to commons: Plan S and the future of scholarly communication</dc:title>
All versions This version
Views 1,1571,157
Downloads 591591
Data volume 291.6 MB291.6 MB
Unique views 1,0371,037
Unique downloads 507507


Cite as