{ "access": { "embargo": { "active": false, "reason": null }, "files": "public", "record": "public", "status": "open" }, "created": "2018-09-23T18:40:25.299478+00:00", "custom_fields": { "journal:journal": { "issue": "7", "pages": "459-488", "title": "Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin", "volume": "6" } }, "deletion_status": { "is_deleted": false, "status": "P" }, "files": { "count": 1, "enabled": true, "entries": { "2017FascePseudoscience.pdf": { "checksum": "md5:f8210e4be86dbe20ebbdbdca500a8054", "ext": "pdf", "id": "c0a82e50-b2d2-497f-b42e-825085cb5d14", "key": "2017FascePseudoscience.pdf", "metadata": null, "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 504599 } }, "order": [], "total_bytes": 504599 }, "id": "1433737", "is_draft": false, "is_published": true, "links": { "access": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/access", "access_links": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/access/links", "access_request": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/access/request", "access_users": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/access/users", "archive": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/files-archive", "archive_media": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/media-files-archive", "communities": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/communities", "communities-suggestions": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/communities-suggestions", "doi": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1433737", "draft": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/draft", "files": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/files", "latest": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/versions/latest", "latest_html": "https://zenodo.org/records/1433737/latest", "media_files": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/media-files", "parent": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433736", "parent_doi": "https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.1433736", "parent_html": "https://zenodo.org/records/1433736", "requests": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/requests", "reserve_doi": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/draft/pids/doi", "self": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737", "self_doi": "https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.1433737", "self_html": "https://zenodo.org/records/1433737", "self_iiif_manifest": "https://zenodo.org/api/iiif/record:1433737/manifest", "self_iiif_sequence": "https://zenodo.org/api/iiif/record:1433737/sequence/default", "versions": "https://zenodo.org/api/records/1433737/versions" }, "media_files": { "count": 0, "enabled": false, "entries": {}, "order": [], "total_bytes": 0 }, "metadata": { "creators": [ { "affiliations": [ { "name": "Universidad de Valencia, Espa\u00f1a" } ], "person_or_org": { "family_name": "Fasce", "given_name": "Angelo", "identifiers": [ { "identifier": "0000-0002-5019-4953", "scheme": "orcid" } ], "name": "Fasce, Angelo", "type": "personal" } } ], "description": "
A critical analysis of twenty-one demarcation criteria is carried out, obtaining as a result a demarcating tool that allows appropriate screening between science and pseudoscience. After an introduction that will emphasize the scientific and social relevance of the demarcation problem and the need of an adequate approach to face it, the specific problems of multicriterial attempts will be remarked, such as their lack of theoretical foundations and the presence of dispensable and contradictory items. On the basis of this first analysis, a metacriterion, the necessary general requirements for a demarcation criterion, will be established. The data analysis will show a lack of progress among demarcation criteria from 1964 to date, and will provide a demarcation criterion partially based on the items with greater support.
", "identifiers": [ { "identifier": "https://disputatio.eu/vols/vol-6-no-7/fasce-pseudoscience/", "scheme": "url" } ], "languages": [ { "id": "eng", "title": { "en": "English" } } ], "publication_date": "2017-12-22", "publisher": "Zenodo", "references": [ { "reference": "Afonso, Ana Sof\u00eda; Gilbert, John (2009). \u00abPseudo-science: A Meaningful Context for Assessing Nature of Science\u00bb. International Journal of Science Education 32, no. 3: pp. 329-48. doi: 10.1080/09500690903055758" }, { "reference": "Agassi, Joseph (1991). \u00abPopper's demarcation of science refuted\u00bb. Methodology and Science 24. pp. 1-7." }, { "reference": "Alters, Brian (1997). \u00abWhose Nature of Science?\u00bb. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34: pp. 39-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199701)34:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-P" }, { "reference": "Bensley Alan; Lilienfeld, Scott; Powel, Lauren (2014). \u00abA new measure of psychological misconceptions: Relations with academic background, critical thinking, and acceptance of paranormal and pseudoscientific claims\u00bb. Learning and Individual Differences 36: pp. 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.009" }, { "reference": "Beyerstein, Barry (1995). Distinguising Science from Pseudoscience. Retrieved from: http://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/sitios/revsalud/beyerstein_cience_vs_pseudoscience.pdf" }, { "reference": "Blancke, Stefaan; Boudry, Maarten; Pigliucci, Massimo (2016). \u00abWhy Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience\u00bb. Theoria 83, no. 1: 78-97. doi: 10.1111/theo.12109" }, { "reference": "Broad, Charlie. (1953). \u00abThe relevance of psychical research to philosophy\u00bb. In Philosophy and parapsychology, edited by Jan Ludwig. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, pp. 43-63." }, { "reference": "Brotherton, Robert; French, Chris.; Pickering, Alan (2013). \u00abMeasuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale\u00bb. Frontiers in Psychology 4: pp. 1-15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279" }, { "reference": "Bunge, Mario (1982). Demarcating Science from Pseudoscience. Fundamenta Scientiae 3: pp. 369-388." }, { "reference": "CAMbrella (2012). \u00abCAMbrella Documents and Reports\u00bb. Retrieved from: http://www.cambrella.eu/home.php?il=203&l=deu." }, { "reference": "Carnap, Rudolf (1950). Logical Fundations Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press." }, { "reference": "Cartwright, Nancy (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/0198247044.001.0001" }, { "reference": "Cat, Jodi (2006). \u00abUnity and Disunity of Science\u00bb. In The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, edited by Sahotra Sarkar and Jessica Pfeifer. New York: Routledge, pp. 842-47." }, { "reference": "Coker, Rory (2001). \u00abDistinguishing Science and Pseudoscience\u00bb. Retrieved from: http://hep.physics.utoronto.ca/~orr/wwwroot/JPH441/Pseudoscience.pdf." }, { "reference": "Cusack, Karen, et al. (2016). \u00abPsychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis\u00bb. Clin Psychol Rev. 43: 128-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.10.003" }, { "reference": "Davidson, Paul; Parker, Kevin (2001). \u00abEye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): A meta-analysis\u00bb. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69, no. 2: pp. 305-316. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.305" }, { "reference": "Derksen, Anthony (1993). \u00abThe seven sins of pseudo-science\u00bb. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24, no. 1: 17-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00769513" }, { "reference": "Dietrich, Michael (2000). \u00abThe problem of the gene\u00bb. C R Acad Sci III. 323, no.12: 1139-46. doi: 10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01257-9" }, { "reference": "Dupr\u00e9, John (1993). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press." }, { "reference": "Dutch, Steven (1982). \u00abNotes on the nature of fringe science\u00bb. Journal of Geological Education 30: pp. 6-13. doi: 10.5408/0022-1368-30.1.6" }, { "reference": "Elliott, Steven (2016). \u00abBad Science: Cause and Consequence\u00bb. J Pharm Sci. 105 (4): pp. 1358-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.01.002" }, { "reference": "Ernst, Edzard (2010). \u00abHomeopathy: what does the \"best\" evidence tell us?\u00bb. Med. J. 192, no. 8: pp. 458-460." }, { "reference": "Fanelli, Daniele (2009). \u00abHow Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data\u00bb. PLoS ONE 4, no. 5: e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738" }, { "reference": "Fasce, Angelo (2017). \u00abLos par\u00e1sitos de la ciencia. Una caracterizaci\u00f3n psicocognitiva del enga\u00f1o pseudocient\u00edfico\u00bb. Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 32, no. 3: 347-365." }, { "reference": "Fasce, Angelo; Pic\u00f3, Alfonso (2018a). \u00abSociodemographic, Personality and Cognitive Differences Among Believers in Pseudoscience, the Paranormal and Conspiracy Theories\u00bb. Under Review." }, { "reference": "Fasce, Angelo; Pic\u00f3, Alfonso (2018b). \u00abScience as a Vaccine. The impact of Scientific Literacy on Unwarranted Beliefs\u00bb. Under Review." }, { "reference": "Fasce, Angelo; Pic\u00f3, Alfonso (2018c). \u00abConceptual Foundations and Validation of the Pseudoscientific Belief Scale\u00bb. Under Review." }, { "reference": "Franz, Timothy; Green, Kris (2013). \u00abThe impact of an interdisciplinary learning community course on pseudoscientific reasoning in first-year science students\u00bb. Journal of the Scholarship of teaching and Learning 13, no. 5: pp. 90-105." }, { "reference": "Garb, Howard; Boyle, Patricia (2003). \u00abUnderstanding Why Some Clinicians Use Pseudoscientific Methods: Findings from Research on Clinical Judgment\u00bb. In Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology, edited by Scott Lilienfeld, Steven Lynn, and Jeffrey Lohr. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 17-39." }, { "reference": "Giere, Ronald (1979). Understanding scientific reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston." }, { "reference": "Glymour, Clark; Stalker, Douglas (1990). \u00abWinning through Pseudoscience\u00bb. In Philosophy of Science and the Occult, edited by Patrick Grim. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 92-103." }, { "reference": "Godfrey-Smit, Peter (1993) \u00abFunctions: Consensus Without Unity\u00bb. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: pp. 196-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.1993.tb00358.x" }, { "reference": "Goldacre, Ben (2008). Bad Science. London: Fourth Estate." }, { "reference": "Grove, J. (1985). \u00abRationality at Risk: Science against Pseudoscience\u00bb. Minerva 23: 216-240. doi: 10.1007/BF01099943" }, { "reference": "Gruenberger, Fred (1964). \u00abA measure for crackpots\u00bb. Science 25: 1413-1415. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3639.1413" }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (1996). \u00abDefining Pseudoscience\u00bb. Philosophia Naturalis 33: 169-176." }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (1983). \u00abVetenskap och ovetenskap\u00bb. Stockholm: Tiden." }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (2006). \u00abFalsificationism Falsified\u00bb. Foundations of Science 11, no. 3: 275-286. doi: 10.1007/s10699-004-5922-1" }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (2007). \u00abValues in Pure and Applied Science\u00bb. Foundations of Science 12: 257-268. doi: 10.1007/s10699-007-9107-6" }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (2009). \u00abCutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation\u00bb. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23, no. 3: 237-243. doi: 10.1080/02698590903196007" }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (2013). Defining pseudoscience and science. In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 61-77. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0005" }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (2017a). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 63: pp. 39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002" }, { "reference": "Hansson, Sven Ove (2017b). \u00abScience and Pseudo-Science\u00bb. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward Zalta. Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/pseudo-science." }, { "reference": "Hempel, Carl [1959](1994). \u00abThe Logic of Functional Analysis\u00bb. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, edited by Michael Martin and Lee McIntyre. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press." }, { "reference": "Herbert, James, et al. (2000). \u00abScience and pseudoscience in the development of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Implications for clinical psychology\u00bb. Clinical Psychology Review 20: pp. 945-971. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00017-3" }, { "reference": "Hey, Jody (2001). \u00abThe mind of the species problem\u00bb. Trends Ecol Evol. 16, no. 7: pp. 326-329. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02145-0" }, { "reference": "Irzik, G\u00fcrol; Nola, Robert (2011). \u00abA Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education\u00bb. Science & Education 20, no. 7-8: pp. 591-607. doi: 10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4" }, { "reference": "Johnson, Matthew; Pigliucci, Massimo (2004). \u00abIs Knowledge of Science Associated with Higher Skepticism of Pseudoscientific Claims?\u00bb. The American Biology Teacher 66, no. 8: pp. 536-548. doi: 10.2307/4451737" }, { "reference": "Jones, John (2005) \u00abMemorandum opinion\u00bb. Retrieved from: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District.pdf." }, { "reference": "Kitcher, Phillip (1982). \u00abAbusing Science: The Case Against Creationism\u00bb. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press." }, { "reference": "Kuhn, Thomas (1974). \u00abLogic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?\u00bb. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, The Library of Living Philosophers vol XIV, book II, edited by Paul Schilpp. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 798-819." }, { "reference": "Kuhn, Thomas (1977). The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press." }, { "reference": "Lacey, Hugh (2004). Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding. New Jersey: Routledge." }, { "reference": "Lack, Caleb; Rousseau, Jaques (2016). Critical thinking, science, and pseudoscience: why we can't trust our brains. New York: Springer Publishing Company. doi: 10.1891/9780826194268" }, { "reference": "Lakatos, Imre (1970). \u00abFalsification and the Methodology of Research program\u00bb. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91-197. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139171434.009" }, { "reference": "Lakatos, Imre (1974a). \u00abPopper on Demarcation and Induction\u00bb. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, The Library of Living Philosophers vol XIV, book I, edited by Paul Schilpp. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 241\u2013273." }, { "reference": "Lakatos, Imre (1974b). \u00abScience and pseudoscience\u00bb. Conceptus 8: pp. 5-9." }, { "reference": "Lakatos, Imre (1978a). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621123" }, { "reference": "Lakatos, Imre (1978b). Mathematics, Science, and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511624926" }, { "reference": "Langmuir, Irving [1953] (1989). \u00abPathological Science\u00bb. Physics Today 42, no. 10: pp. 36-48. doi: 10.1063/1.881205" }, { "reference": "Laudan, Larry (1982). \u00abScience at the Bar \u2013 Causes for Concern\u00bb. In But Is It Science?, edited by Michael Ruse. Buffalo: Prometheus." }, { "reference": "Laudan, Larry (1983). \u00abThe Demise of the Demarcation Problem\u00bb. In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, edited by R. Cohen and Larry Laudan. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 111-127. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6" }, { "reference": "Lewandowsky, Stephan; Gignac, Gilles; Oberauer, Klaus (2013). \u00abThe role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science\u00bb. PLoS One 8, no. 10: e75637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075637" }, { "reference": "Liliefeld, Scott.; Ammirati, Rachel; David, Michael (2012). \u00abDistinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error\u00bb. Journal of School Psychology 50, no. 1: 7-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.006" }, { "reference": "Lilienfeld, Scotti; Lohr, Jeffrey; Morier, Dean. (2004). \u00abThe Teaching of Courses in the Science and Pseudoscience of Psychology: Useful Resources\u00bb. Teaching of Psychology 28, no. 3: 182-191. doi: 10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_03" }, { "reference": "Lobato, Emilio, et al. (2014). \u00abExamining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population\u00bb. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28: 617-625. doi: 10.1002/acp.3042" }, { "reference": "Lugg, Andrew (1987). \u00abBunkum, Flim-Flam and Quackery: Pseudoscience as a Philosophical Problem\u00bb. Dialectica 41: 221\u201330. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1987.tb00889.x" }, { "reference": "Lundstr\u00f4m, Mats; Jakobsson, Anders (2009). \u00abStudents' Ideas Regarding Science and Pseudo-science in Relation to the Human Body and Health\u00bb. Nordina 5, no. 1: pp. 3-17. doi: 10.5617/nordina.279" }, { "reference": "Mahner, Martin (2007). \u00abDemarcating Science from Non-science\u00bb. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science Vol. 1, General Philosophy of Science\u2014Focal Issues, edited by Theo Kuipers. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 515-575." }, { "reference": "Mahner, Martin (2013). \u00abScience and Pseudoscience. How to Demarcate after the (Alleged) Demise of the Demarcation Problem\u00bb. In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29-45. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0003" }, { "reference": "Majima, Yoshimasa (2015). \u00abBelief in Pseudoscience, Cognitive Style and Science Literacy\u00bb. Applied Cognitive Psychology 29: pp. 552-559. doi: 10.1002/acp.3136" }, { "reference": "McNally, Richard (2007). \u00abDispelling confusiong about traumatic dissociative amnesia\u00bb. Mayo Clin. Proc. 82, no. 9: pp. 1083-1090. doi: 10.4065/82.9.1083" }, { "reference": "Merton, Robert [1942] (1973). \u00abThe Normative Structure of Science\u00bb. In The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by Robert Merton. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 267-278." }, { "reference": "Nickles, Thomas (2013). The Problem of Demarcation History and Future. In M. Pigliucci and M. Boudry (Eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem (pp. 101-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press." }, { "reference": "Open Science Collaboration (2015). \u00abEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science\u00bb. Science 349, no. 6251: aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716" }, { "reference": "Overton, William (1982). \u00abCreationism in Schools: The Decision in McLean vs. the Arkansas Board of Education\u00bb Science 215, no. 4535: pp. 934-943. doi: 10.1126/science.215.4535.934" }, { "reference": "Park, R. (2003). \u00abSeven Warning Signs of Bogus Science\u00bb. Retrieved from: http://www.unl.edu/rhames/park-seven-signs.pdf" }, { "reference": "Pigliucci, Massimo (2013). \u00abThe Demarcation Problem. A (Belated) Response to Laudan\u00bb. In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 9-28. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0002" }, { "reference": "Popper, Karl (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Basic Books." }, { "reference": "Popper, Karl (1974). \u00abReply to my critics\u00bb. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper. The Library of Living Philosophers vol. XIV, book 2, edited by Paul Schilpp. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 961-1197." }, { "reference": "Reisch, George (1998). \u00abPluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience\u00bb. Philosophy of Science 65: pp. 333-48. doi: 10.1086/392642" }, { "reference": "Rescher, Nicholas (1998). \u00abPredicting the Future. An Introduction to the Theory of Forecasting\u00bb. New York: SUNY Press." }, { "reference": "Resnik, David (2000). \u00abA Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem\u00bb. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31: 249-267. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00004-2" }, { "reference": "Rothbartd, D. (1990). \u00abDemarcating Genuine Science from Pseudoscience\u00bb. In Philosophy of Science and the Occult, edited by Patrick Grim. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 111-122." }, { "reference": "Ruse, Michael (1982). \u00abCreation-Science is Not Science. Science\u00bb. Technology, and Human Values 7, no. 40: pp. 72-78. doi: 10.1177/016224398200700313" }, { "reference": "Schlick, Theodore; Vaughn, Lewis (1995). How to think about weird things. Critical thinking for a New Age. New Tork: McGraw-Hill." }, { "reference": "Schindler, Samuel (2018). \u00abPseudo-solutions to the demarcation\u00bb. Manuscript." }, { "reference": "Shermer, Michael (2013). Science and Pseudoscience. \u00abThe Difference in Practice and the Difference It Makes\u00bb. In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 203-225. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0012" }, { "reference": "Siitonen, Arto (1984). \u00abDemarcation of Science from the Point of View of Problems and Problem-Stating\u00bb. Philosophia naturalis 21: pp. 339-353." }, { "reference": "Skelton, Randall (2011). \u00abA Survey to the Forensic Sciences\u00bb. Raleigh: lulu.com." }, { "reference": "Thagard, Paul (1978). \u00abWhy Astrology is a Pseudoscience?\u00bb. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1: 223-234." }, { "reference": "Thagard, Paul (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge: The MIT Press." }, { "reference": "Tobacyk, Jerome (2004). \u00abA Revised Paranormal Belief Scale\u00bb. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 23, no. 1: pp. 94-98. doi: 10.24972/ijts.2004.23.1.94" }, { "reference": "Toulmin, Stephen (1984). \u00abThe new philosophy of science and the \"paranormal\"\u00bb. Skeptical Inquirer 9: pp. 48-55." }, { "reference": "Tseng, Yuang-Chueh, et al. (2014) \u00abThe Relationship Between Exposure to Pseudoscientific Television Programmes and Pseudoscientific Beliefs among Taiwanese University Students\u00bb. International Journal of Science Education B, no. 4: pp. 107-122." }, { "reference": "Tuomela, Raimo (1985). Science, Action and Reality. Reidel, Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-5446-5" }, { "reference": "van Fraassen, Bas (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press. doi: 10.1093/0198248601.001.0001" }, { "reference": "Vollmer, Gerhard (1993). Wissenschaftstheorie im Einsatz, Beitr\u00e4ge zu einer selbstkritischen Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Hirzel Verlag." }, { "reference": "Wilson, Edward (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books." }, { "reference": "Wilson, Fred (2000). The Logic and Methodology of Science and Pseudoscience. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press." }, { "reference": "Worrall, Jhon (2003). \u00abNormal Science and Dogmatism, Paradigms and Progress: Kuhn 'versus' Popper and Lakatos\u00bb. In Thomas Kuhn, edited by Thomas Nickles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press." } ], "related_identifiers": [ { "identifier": "2254-0601", "relation_type": { "id": "iscitedby", "title": { "de": "Wird zitiert von", "en": "Is cited by" } }, "scheme": "issn" } ], "resource_type": { "id": "publication-article", "title": { "de": "Zeitschriftenartikel", "en": "Journal article" } }, "rights": [ { "description": { "en": "The Creative Commons Attribution license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the condition that the creator is appropriately credited." }, "icon": "cc-by-icon", "id": "cc-by-4.0", "props": { "scheme": "spdx", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode" }, "title": { "en": "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" } } ], "subjects": [ { "subject": "Pseudoscience" }, { "subject": "Demarcation criterion" }, { "subject": "Multicriteria" }, { "subject": "Pseudociencia" }, { "subject": "Criterio de demarcaci\u00f3n" }, { "subject": "Multicriterios" } ], "title": "What do we mean when we speak of pseudoscience? The development of a demarcation criterion based on the analysis of twenty-one previous attempts [\u00bfQu\u00e9 queremos decir cuando hablamos de pseudociencia? El desarrollo de un criterio de demarcaci\u00f3n basado en el an\u00e1lisis de veinti\u00fan intentos anteriores]" }, "parent": { "access": { "owned_by": { "user": 21128 } }, "communities": { "default": "d67aade5-77e7-4843-bfe1-4b51bc3fd26e", "entries": [ { "access": { "member_policy": "open", "members_visibility": "public", "record_policy": "open", "review_policy": "open", "visibility": "public" }, "children": { "allow": false }, "created": "2016-03-28T03:03:51+00:00", "custom_fields": {}, "deletion_status": { "is_deleted": false, "status": "P" }, "id": "d67aade5-77e7-4843-bfe1-4b51bc3fd26e", "links": {}, "metadata": { "curation_policy": "", "page": "Disputatio: Philosophical Research Bulletin es una revista académica que publica trabajos de investigación cuya finalidad sea la de contribuir de forma rigurosa a las discusiones \ufb01losó\ufb01cas actuales dentro de un marco de diálogo crítico sobre el papel de las humanidades, sus desafíos y su importancia para el tiempo presente.
\r\n\r\nDisputatio, ISSN: 2254-0601, se publica anualmente, bajo una licencia Creative Commons bajo una Licencia Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), y se distribuye internacionalmente a través GREDOS (USAL), ZENODO (CERN). Todos sus documentos están en acceso abierto de manera gratuita. Acepta trabajos en español, ingles y portugués.
", "title": "Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin" }, "revision_id": 0, "slug": "disputatio", "updated": "2016-03-28T03:06:02+00:00" } ], "ids": [ "d67aade5-77e7-4843-bfe1-4b51bc3fd26e" ] }, "id": "1433736", "pids": { "doi": { "client": "datacite", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.1433736", "provider": "datacite" } } }, "pids": { "doi": { "client": "datacite", "identifier": "10.5281/zenodo.1433737", "provider": "datacite" }, "oai": { "identifier": "oai:zenodo.org:1433737", "provider": "oai" } }, "revision_id": 98, "stats": { "all_versions": { "data_volume": 886580443.0, "downloads": 1757, "unique_downloads": 1640, "unique_views": 532, "views": 580 }, "this_version": { "data_volume": 882543651.0, "downloads": 1749, "unique_downloads": 1633, "unique_views": 526, "views": 573 } }, "status": "published", "updated": "2020-01-20T17:09:22.473934+00:00", "versions": { "index": 1, "is_latest": true } }