Preprint Open Access

We're still failing to deliver open access and solve the serials crisis: to succeed we need a digital transformation of scholarly communication using internet-era principles.

Green, Toby

DCAT Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="" xmlns:adms="" xmlns:cnt="" xmlns:dc="" xmlns:dct="" xmlns:dctype="" xmlns:dcat="" xmlns:duv="" xmlns:foaf="" xmlns:frapo="" xmlns:geo="" xmlns:gsp="" xmlns:locn="" xmlns:org="" xmlns:owl="" xmlns:prov="" xmlns:rdfs="" xmlns:schema="" xmlns:skos="" xmlns:vcard="" xmlns:wdrs="">
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="">
    <rdf:type rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:type rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:identifier rdf:datatype=""></dct:identifier>
    <foaf:page rdf:resource=""/>
        <rdf:type rdf:resource=""/>
        <foaf:name>Green, Toby</foaf:name>
            <foaf:name>OECD Publishing</foaf:name>
    <dct:title>We're still failing to deliver open access and solve the serials crisis: to succeed we need a digital transformation of scholarly communication using internet-era principles.</dct:title>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="">2018</dct:issued>
    <dcat:keyword>Open Access</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Predatory journals</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Digital transformation</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Article publication charges (APCs)</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Plan S</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Reputation economy</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Peer review</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Pay wall</dcat:keyword>
    <dcat:keyword>Serials crisis</dcat:keyword>
    <dct:issued rdf:datatype="">2018-09-06</dct:issued>
    <dct:language rdf:resource=""/>
    <owl:sameAs rdf:resource=""/>
        <skos:notation rdf:datatype=""></skos:notation>
    <dct:isVersionOf rdf:resource=""/>
    <dct:description>&lt;p&gt;A year ago, I concluded that we had failed in our quest to make scholarship open access (OA): the race had been won by pirates like SciHub&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=""&gt;(Green, 2017)&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;Twelve months on, how do things look?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key points:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;We&amp;rsquo;re still failing to deliver open access (OA): around a fifth of new articles will be born free in 2018, roughly the same as in 2017.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Librarians, funders and negotiators are getting tougher with publishers but offsetting, &amp;lsquo;Publish and Read&amp;rsquo;, deals based on APCs won&amp;rsquo;t deliver OA for all or solve the serials crisis.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;The authors of Budapest, Bethesda and Berlin OA declarations foresaw three changes with the coming of the internet. Flipping to a barrier to publish (APCs) from a barrier to read (subscriptions) wasn&amp;rsquo;t one of them.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;By itself, OA won&amp;rsquo;t reduce costs to solve the serials crisis: a digital transformation of scholarly communications based on internet-era principles is needed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Following the internet-era principle of &amp;lsquo;fail-fast&amp;rsquo;, what if papers are first posted as preprints and only if they succeed in gaining attention will editors invite submission to their journal&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;In clinging onto traditional journals to advance the careers of the few (authors), OA is delayed for the many (readers): rebuilding the reputation economy to accept preprints could be the catalyst to deliver OA, solve the serials crisis and drive out predatory journals&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt;</dct:description>
    <dct:description xml:lang="">Author's Note In keeping with the proposition in this paper, and following the advice of Pippa Smart, Editor of Learned Publishing who saw an early draft, I'm releasing it first as a preprint to test if it 'fails fast' or not. I will do my best to promote it so that it gains an audience and I invite readers to comment, propose improvements and point out where I've gone wrong. I also invite journal editors to consider whether it has 'succeeded' and if in their opinion it has I look forward to being asked to submit it for peer review and formal publication in due course.</dct:description>
    <dct:accessRights rdf:resource=""/>
      <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess">
        <rdfs:label>Open Access</rdfs:label>
          <dct:RightsStatement rdf:about="">
            <rdfs:label>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</rdfs:label>
        <dcat:accessURL rdf:resource=""/>
All versions This version
Views 6,3536,356
Downloads 2,2072,206
Data volume 1.8 GB1.8 GB
Unique views 5,8165,819
Unique downloads 1,9921,991


Cite as