Conference paper Open Access

What to Read Next? Challenges and Preliminary Results in Selecting Representative Documents

Beck, Tilman; Böschen, Falk; Scherp, Ansgar

Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="" xmlns:oai_dc="" xmlns:xsi="" xsi:schemaLocation="">
  <dc:creator>Beck, Tilman</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Böschen, Falk</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Scherp, Ansgar</dc:creator>
  <dc:description>The vast amount of scientific literature poses a challenge when one is trying to understand a previously unknown topic. Selecting a representative subset of documents that covers most of the desired content can solve this challenge by presenting the user a small subset of documents. We build on existing research on representative subset extraction and apply it in an information retrieval setting. Our document selection process consists of three steps: computation of the document representations, clustering, and selection of documents. We implement and compare two different document representations, two different clustering algorithms, and three different selection methods using a coverage and a redundancy metric. We execute our 36 experiments on two datasets, with 10 sample queries each, from different domains. The results show that there is no clear favorite and that we need to ask the question whether coverage and redundancy are sufficient for evaluating representative subsets.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Representative document selection</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Document clustering</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>What to Read Next? Challenges and Preliminary Results in Selecting Representative Documents</dc:title>
Views 140
Downloads 102
Data volume 77.7 MB
Unique views 126
Unique downloads 99


Cite as