Journal article Open Access
Do we need an Open Science coalition?
Tennant, Jon
This is an opinion piece published on Elephant in the lab – a blog journal on science policy. It is part of a series of articles analysing Open Science.
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
EitL_Tennant.pdf
md5:90ad685fec929288c5e09233fdc770bd |
220.3 kB | Download |
Brembs, B., Button K., Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7.
Center for Responsible Politics (2018). RELX Group. OpenSecrets.org.
Else, H. (2018). Dutch publishing giant cuts off researchers in Germany and Sweden. Nature, 559.
European Commission (2017). Research Innovation and Science Policy Experts (RISE).
Fowler, N. (2018). Elsevier serves the global research community to deliver open science. Elsevier.
Larivière, V., Haustein,S., Mongeon, P. (2015). The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLOS ONE.
Mak, A. (2018). Who Gets to Read the Research We Pay For? Scientific journals' lock on new studies has ignited tension for years. When it comes to access for people with rare diseases, it becomes an ethical issue too. SLATE.
Posado, A., Chen, G. (2017). Preliminary Findings: Rent Seeking by Elsevier.Publishers are increasingly in control of scholarly infrastructure and why we should care. A case study of Elsevier. GAP.
Poynder, R. (2012). Budapest Open Access Initiative reaffirmed and refreshed. Open & Shut?.
Tennant, J. (2018) Elsevier serves the global research community to deliver open science?. Green Tea and Velociraptors.
Tennant, J. (2018). Elsevier are corrupting open science in Europe. The Guardian.
| All versions | This version | |
|---|---|---|
| Views | 701 | 701 |
| Downloads | 99 | 99 |
| Data volume | 21.8 MB | 21.8 MB |
| Unique views | 672 | 672 |
| Unique downloads | 82 | 82 |
- Publication date:
- September 3, 2018
- DOI:
-
- Keyword(s):
- Open Science
- License (for files):
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International