Report Open Access

FAIR in practice - Jisc report on the Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reuseable Data Principles

Allen, Robert; Hartland, David

JSON-LD ( Export

  "inLanguage": {
    "alternateName": "eng", 
    "@type": "Language", 
    "name": "English"
  "description": "<p>This report investigates the meaning and (potential) impact<br>\nof the FAIR data principles in practice. These principles<br>\nwere established by a group of diverse stakeholders<br>\nengaging via a working group in FORCE11. They are<br>\nreferenced in many policy documents and in developments<br>\nof open science, for example, the European Open Science<br>\nCloud.&nbsp;</p>\n\n<p>This report explored FAIR with stakeholders in the<br>\nUK academic research community. Its aims were to<br>\nunderstand how using or being inspired by these principles<br>\nimproves the findability, accessibility, interoperability and<br>\nreuse of research data, including consideration of<br>\ndisciplinary differences.</p>\n\n<p>Jisc established a group of research data experts and Jisc<br>\nstaff who provided expertise and helped to validate<br>\nfindings. Interviews and focus groups were conducted,<br>\nprimarily with researchers, but also involving input from<br>\nresearch support professionals, publishers and funders.</p>\n\n<p><br>\nAn assessment of the use of FAIR principles in institutional<br>\nresearch data management (RDM) guidance was also<br>\ncarried out. Data collected from these activities was<br>\nsynthesised and structured using a PEST framework -<br>\ngrouped into factors relating to Political, Economic, Social<br>\nand Technical aspects.</p>\n\n<p>Explicit use of FAIR was seen to be limited, in many cases,<br>\nto discussion at a fairly conceptual level amongst those<br>\nmost heavily involved in best practice of data management.<br>\nEven where FAIR was fairly well established as a term and<br>\na concept, it tended to largely reflect existing practice.<br>\nArguably this was without significantly influencing many<br>\npractical changes for those at the &ldquo;leading edge&rdquo; of data<br>\nmanagement, although it did provide a new and effective<br>\ncommon way of communicating best practice.</p>\n\n<p>However, in exploring the underlying practices of research,<br>\ndemonstrating findability, accessibility, interoperability<br>\nand reusability, there was considerable evidence that<br>\ngood practice existed in all of these elements. In many<br>\ncases this was both well established (over many years)<br>\nand continually improving.</p>", 
  "license": "", 
  "creator": [
      "affiliation": "Hapsis", 
      "@id": "", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Allen, Robert"
      "affiliation": "Hapsis", 
      "@id": "", 
      "@type": "Person", 
      "name": "Hartland, David"
  "headline": "FAIR in practice - Jisc report on the Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reuseable Data Principles", 
  "image": "", 
  "datePublished": "2018-05-21", 
  "url": "", 
  "version": "1", 
  "keywords": [
    "open science", 
    "research data management", 
  "@context": "", 
  "identifier": "", 
  "@id": "", 
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
  "name": "FAIR in practice - Jisc report on the Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reuseable Data Principles"
All versions This version
Views 4,1624,155
Downloads 2,4192,418
Data volume 6.8 GB6.8 GB
Unique views 3,7743,767
Unique downloads 2,0102,009


Cite as