Report Open Access
Allen, Robert;
Hartland, David
{ "inLanguage": { "alternateName": "eng", "@type": "Language", "name": "English" }, "description": "<p>This report investigates the meaning and (potential) impact<br>\nof the FAIR data principles in practice. These principles<br>\nwere established by a group of diverse stakeholders<br>\nengaging via a working group in FORCE11. They are<br>\nreferenced in many policy documents and in developments<br>\nof open science, for example, the European Open Science<br>\nCloud. </p>\n\n<p>This report explored FAIR with stakeholders in the<br>\nUK academic research community. Its aims were to<br>\nunderstand how using or being inspired by these principles<br>\nimproves the findability, accessibility, interoperability and<br>\nreuse of research data, including consideration of<br>\ndisciplinary differences.</p>\n\n<p>Jisc established a group of research data experts and Jisc<br>\nstaff who provided expertise and helped to validate<br>\nfindings. Interviews and focus groups were conducted,<br>\nprimarily with researchers, but also involving input from<br>\nresearch support professionals, publishers and funders.</p>\n\n<p><br>\nAn assessment of the use of FAIR principles in institutional<br>\nresearch data management (RDM) guidance was also<br>\ncarried out. Data collected from these activities was<br>\nsynthesised and structured using a PEST framework -<br>\ngrouped into factors relating to Political, Economic, Social<br>\nand Technical aspects.</p>\n\n<p>Explicit use of FAIR was seen to be limited, in many cases,<br>\nto discussion at a fairly conceptual level amongst those<br>\nmost heavily involved in best practice of data management.<br>\nEven where FAIR was fairly well established as a term and<br>\na concept, it tended to largely reflect existing practice.<br>\nArguably this was without significantly influencing many<br>\npractical changes for those at the “leading edge” of data<br>\nmanagement, although it did provide a new and effective<br>\ncommon way of communicating best practice.</p>\n\n<p>However, in exploring the underlying practices of research,<br>\ndemonstrating findability, accessibility, interoperability<br>\nand reusability, there was considerable evidence that<br>\ngood practice existed in all of these elements. In many<br>\ncases this was both well established (over many years)<br>\nand continually improving.</p>", "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode", "creator": [ { "affiliation": "Hapsis", "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2190-1556", "@type": "Person", "name": "Allen, Robert" }, { "affiliation": "Hapsis", "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-9644", "@type": "Person", "name": "Hartland, David" } ], "headline": "FAIR in practice - Jisc report on the Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reuseable Data Principles", "image": "https://zenodo.org/static/img/logos/zenodo-gradient-round.svg", "datePublished": "2018-05-21", "url": "https://zenodo.org/record/1245568", "version": "1", "keywords": [ "open science", "research data management", "standards" ], "@context": "https://schema.org/", "identifier": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1245568", "@id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1245568", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "name": "FAIR in practice - Jisc report on the Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reuseable Data Principles" }
All versions | This version | |
---|---|---|
Views | 3,880 | 3,873 |
Downloads | 2,298 | 2,297 |
Data volume | 6.5 GB | 6.5 GB |
Unique views | 3,513 | 3,506 |
Unique downloads | 1,905 | 1,904 |