Caso, Roberto
2018-05-01
<p>The evaluation of scientific research is based on data protected by secrecy and intellectual property (e.g., Elsevier Scopus or Clarivate Web of Science). The peer review process is essentially anonymous. While science has progressed thanks to public dialogue, the current evaluation system is centered on private information control. This represents a fundamental shift from democratic to authoritarian science. Open Science may contrast this change only if it is accepted as the heir, in the digital age, of the values and principles that public and democratic science has traditionally fostered in the age of printing, thus becoming the guardian of a democratic society.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1238887
oai:zenodo.org:1238887
eng
Zenodo
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1238886
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
2018, Private Law Consortium 2018, Harvard, Cambridge Ma., 14, 15 May 2018
Open Science
Intellectual property
Copyright
Evaluation of Science
Peer review
Democracy
Robert K. Merton
Michael Polanyi
Democratic science
CUDOS
Norms of science
The Darkest Hour: Private Information Control and the End of the Democratic Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferencePaper