Journal article Open Access

The challenge of making language description and comparison mutually beneficial

Haspelmath, Martin


Dublin Core Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Haspelmath, Martin</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2016-04-29</dc:date>
  <dc:description>Here I argue that the distinction between comparative concepts and descriptive categories helps language describers and typologists to benefit from each other because describers are free to set up their own categories, typologists are free to define their own concepts, comparison need not involve complete systems, and interlinear translation can be either based on comparative concepts or descriptive categories. A similar distinction also exists in other disciplines that deal with cultural concepts.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/1236849</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>10.1515/lingty-2016-0008</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>oai:zenodo.org:1236849</dc:identifier>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/670985/</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Linguistic Typology 20(2) 299-301</dc:source>
  <dc:subject>comparative concept, language description</dc:subject>
  <dc:title>The challenge of making language description and comparison mutually beneficial</dc:title>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:type>publication-article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
136
100
views
downloads
Views 136
Downloads 100
Data volume 8.7 MB
Unique views 130
Unique downloads 94

Share

Cite as