Journal article Open Access

Geomagnetic reversals from impacts on the Earth

Muller, Richard A.; Morris, Donald E.

MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="">
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal</subfield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">1986-11-01</subfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120173234.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">1231384</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The impact of a large extraterrestrial object on the Earth can produce a geomagnetic reversal through the following mechanism: dust from the impact crater and soot from fires trigger a climate change and the beginning of a little ice age. The redistribution of water near the equator to ice at high latitudes alters the rotation rate of the crust and mantle of the Earth. If the sea‐level change is sufficiently large (&amp;gt;10 meters) and rapid (in a few hundred years), then the velocity shear in the liquid core disrupts the convective cells that drive the dynamo. The new convective cells that subsequently form distort and tangle the previous field, reducing the dipole component near to zero while increasing the energy in multipole components. Eventually a dipole is rebuilt by dynamo action, and the event is seen either as a geomagnetic reversal or as an excursion. Sudden climate changes from other causes such as volcanic eruptions could also trigger reversals. This mechanism may not be the sole cause of geomagnetic reversals, but it can account for the rapid drop of the dipole component preceding a reversal, the predominance of multipole components during a transition, the associations of microtektites, temperature drops and extinctions with reversals, and the possible correlation between peaks in the geomagnetic reversal rate and the times of mass extinctions. The model may also account for the long‐term changes in the average rate of reversals. We make several testable predictions.</subfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Morris, Donald E.</subfield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">616207</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:c9a83ecff0ad35bc3c9eea17146bf365</subfield>
    <subfield code="u"></subfield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">article</subfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Muller, Richard A.</subfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1029/gl013i011p01177</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Geomagnetic reversals from impacts on the Earth</subfield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2"></subfield>
Views 331
Downloads 156
Data volume 96.1 MB
Unique views 321
Unique downloads 145


Cite as