Other Open Access

Comparing and contrasting threat assessments of plant species at the global and sub‑global level

Ross Mounce; Malin Rivers; Suzanne Sharrock; , Paul Smith; Samuel Brockington


MARC21 XML Export

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <leader>00000nam##2200000uu#4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200120172011.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="001">1197396</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Malin Rivers</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Suzanne Sharrock</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">, Paul Smith</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Samuel Brockington</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">89442</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">md5:52a9008e96de3fbb46d75d7321ca7b12</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://zenodo.org/record/1197396/files/postprint.docx</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="542" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">open</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2017-12-12</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="p">openaire</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">oai:zenodo.org:1197396</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ross Mounce</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparing and contrasting threat assessments of plant species at the global and sub‑global level</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">cc-by</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">opendefinition.org</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">&lt;p&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Evidence-based assessments of extinction risk are established tools used to inform the&lt;br&gt;
conservation of plant species, and form the basis of key targets within the framework of the&lt;br&gt;
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC). An overall picture of plants threat assessments&lt;br&gt;
is challenging due to the use of a variety of methodologies and range in scope from global to&lt;br&gt;
subnational. In this study, we quantify the state of progress in assessing the extinction risk of all&lt;br&gt;
land plants, determine the key geographic and taxonomic gaps with respect to our understanding&lt;br&gt;
of plant extinction risk, and evaluate the impact of different sources and methodologies on the&lt;br&gt;
utility of plant assessments. To this end, we have analyzed a cleaned dataset compiled from&lt;br&gt;
IUCN Red List of threatened Species and Regional Red Lists. We reveal that there are&lt;br&gt;
assessments available for 89,810 distinct species or 25% of all accepted land plant species.&lt;br&gt;
However unlike with other major organismal lineages the bulk of the plant species assessments&lt;br&gt;
are derived from Regional Red Lists, and not the global IUCN Red List. We demonstrate that&lt;br&gt;
this bias towards regional assessments results in distinct taxonomic and geographic strengths and&lt;br&gt;
weaknesses, and we identify substantial taxonomic and geographic gaps in the assessment&lt;br&gt;
coverage. With species that have been assessed in common at both global and regional levels, we&lt;br&gt;
explore the implications of deriving threat assessments from different sources. We find that half&lt;br&gt;
of global and regional assessments do not agree on the exact category of extinction risk for a&lt;br&gt;
species. As expected, regional assessments tend to assign a higher risk of extinction, however&lt;br&gt;
worryingly regional assessments underestimate extinction risk with almost equal frequency. We&lt;br&gt;
conclude with recommended interventions, but support the suggestion that all threat assessments&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3 should be pooled to provide a more data for GSPC targets.&lt;/p&gt;</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="n">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">isVersionOf</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.1197395</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.5281/zenodo.1197396</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">publication</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">other</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
301
119
views
downloads
All versions This version
Views 301301
Downloads 119119
Data volume 10.6 MB10.6 MB
Unique views 274274
Unique downloads 117117

Share

Cite as